IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i5d10.1038_s41562-024-01842-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental manipulation of the value of effort

Author

Listed:
  • Hause Lin

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Cornell University)

  • Andrew Westbrook

    (Rutgers University)

  • Frank Fan

    (University of Toronto)

  • Michael Inzlicht

    (University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

Abstract

People who take on challenges and persevere longer are more likely to succeed in life. But individuals often avoid exerting effort, and there is limited experimental research investigating whether we can learn to value effort. We developed a paradigm to test the hypothesis that people can learn to value effort and will seek effortful challenges if directly incentivized to do so. We also dissociate the effects of rewarding people for choosing effortful challenges and performing well. The results provide limited evidence that rewarding effort increased people’s willingness to choose harder tasks when rewards were no longer offered (near transfer). There was also mixed evidence that rewarding effort increased willingness to choose harder tasks in another unrelated and unrewarded task (far transfer). These heterogeneous results highlight the need for further research to understand when this paradigm may be the most effective for increasing and generalizing the value of effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Hause Lin & Andrew Westbrook & Frank Fan & Michael Inzlicht, 2024. "An experimental manipulation of the value of effort," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 988-1000, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01842-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01842-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01842-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-024-01842-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01842-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.