Author
Listed:
- Gordon Pennycook
(Cornell University
University of Regina)
- Adam J. Berinsky
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Puneet Bhargava
(University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania)
- Hause Lin
(University of Regina
Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Rocky Cole
(Jigsaw (Google))
- Beth Goldberg
(Jigsaw (Google))
- Stephan Lewandowsky
(University of Bristol
University of Potsdam
University of Western Australia)
- David G. Rand
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Abstract
Misinformation is a major focus of intervention efforts. Psychological inoculation—an intervention intended to help people identify manipulation techniques—is being adopted at scale around the globe. Yet the efficacy of this approach for increasing belief accuracy remains unclear, as prior work uses synthetic materials that do not contain claims of truth. To address this issue, we conducted five studies with 7,286 online participants using a set of news headlines based on real-world true/false content in which we systematically varied the presence or absence of emotional manipulation. Although an emotional manipulation inoculation did help participants identify emotional manipulation, there was no improvement in participants’ ability to tell truth from falsehood. However, when the inoculation was paired with an intervention that draws people’s attention to accuracy, the combined intervention did successfully improve truth discernment (by increasing belief in true content). These results provide evidence for synergy between popular misinformation interventions.
Suggested Citation
Gordon Pennycook & Adam J. Berinsky & Puneet Bhargava & Hause Lin & Rocky Cole & Beth Goldberg & Stephan Lewandowsky & David G. Rand, 2024.
"Inoculation and accuracy prompting increase accuracy discernment in combination but not alone,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 2330-2341, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02023-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02023-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02023-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.