IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v8y2024i12d10.1038_s41562-024-02015-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misinformation research needs ecological validity

Author

Listed:
  • James Crum

    (University of Colorado)

  • Cara Spencer

    (University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • Emily Doherty

    (University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

  • Erin Richardson

    (University of Colorado)

  • Sage Sherman

    (University of Colorado)

  • Amy W. Hays

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Nitesh Saxena

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Richard E. Niemeyer

    (United States Air Force Academy)

  • Allison P. Anderson

    (University of Colorado)

  • Marta Čeko

    (University of Colorado)

  • Leanne Hirshfield

    (University of Colorado
    University of Colorado)

Abstract

How misinformation affects cognition and behaviour is of increasing interest. Research has identified predictors of susceptibility, but how they play out during real-world behaviour remains unclear. We urge misinformation neuroscience researchers to prioritize ecological validity by collecting data across the ecological spectrum.

Suggested Citation

  • James Crum & Cara Spencer & Emily Doherty & Erin Richardson & Sage Sherman & Amy W. Hays & Nitesh Saxena & Richard E. Niemeyer & Allison P. Anderson & Marta Čeko & Leanne Hirshfield, 2024. "Misinformation research needs ecological validity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 2268-2271, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02015-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02015-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02015-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-024-02015-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1038_s41562-024-02015-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.