Author
Listed:
- Tamar I. Regev
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Colton Casto
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Harvard University
Harvard University)
- Eghbal A. Hosseini
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
- Markus Adamek
(National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Washington University School of Medicine)
- Anthony L. Ritaccio
(Mayo Clinic)
- Jon T. Willie
(National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Washington University School of Medicine)
- Peter Brunner
(National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies
Washington University School of Medicine
Albany Medical College)
- Evelina Fedorenko
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Harvard University)
Abstract
Despite long knowing what brain areas support language comprehension, our knowledge of the neural computations that these frontal and temporal regions implement remains limited. One important unresolved question concerns functional differences among the neural populations that comprise the language network. Here we leveraged the high spatiotemporal resolution of human intracranial recordings (n = 22) to examine responses to sentences and linguistically degraded conditions. We discovered three response profiles that differ in their temporal dynamics. These profiles appear to reflect different temporal receptive windows, with average windows of about 1, 4 and 6 words, respectively. Neural populations exhibiting these profiles are interleaved across the language network, which suggests that all language regions have direct access to distinct, multiscale representations of linguistic input—a property that may be critical for the efficiency and robustness of language processing.
Suggested Citation
Tamar I. Regev & Colton Casto & Eghbal A. Hosseini & Markus Adamek & Anthony L. Ritaccio & Jon T. Willie & Peter Brunner & Evelina Fedorenko, 2024.
"Neural populations in the language network differ in the size of their temporal receptive windows,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1924-1942, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01944-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01944-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01944-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.