Author
Listed:
- Basile Garcia
(Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives Computationnelles, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, ENS, PSL, INSERM)
- Maël Lebreton
(Paris School of Economics
University of Geneva)
- Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde
(Institut Jean Nicod, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL, CNRS
Assas CRED – Université Panthéon-Assas - Paris 2)
- Stefano Palminteri
(Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives Computationnelles, Département d’Etudes Cognitives, ENS, PSL, INSERM)
Abstract
Standard models of decision-making assume each option is associated with subjective value, regardless of whether this value is inferred from experience (experiential) or explicitly instructed probabilistic outcomes (symbolic). In this study, we present results that challenge the assumption of unified representation of experiential and symbolic value. Across nine experiments, we presented participants with hybrid decisions between experiential and symbolic options. Participants’ choices exhibited a pattern consistent with a systematic neglect of the experiential values. This normatively irrational decision strategy held after accounting for alternative explanations, and persisted even when it bore an economic cost. Overall, our results demonstrate that experiential and symbolic values are not symmetrically considered in hybrid decisions, suggesting they recruit different representational systems that may be assigned different priority levels in the decision process. These findings challenge the dominant models commonly used in value-based decision-making research.
Suggested Citation
Basile Garcia & Maël Lebreton & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Stefano Palminteri, 2023.
"Experiential values are underweighted in decisions involving symbolic options,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 611-626, April.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01496-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01496-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:7:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01496-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.