Author
Listed:
- Shi Yao
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Meng Zhang
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Shan-Shan Dong
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Jia-Hao Wang
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Kun Zhang
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Jing Guo
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Yan Guo
(Xi’an Jiaotong University)
- Tie-Lin Yang
(Xi’an Jiaotong University
Xi’an Jiaotong University)
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that relative carbohydrate intake affects depression; however, the association between carbohydrates and depression remains controversial. To test this, we performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genetic variants associated with relative carbohydrate intake (N = 268,922) and major depressive disorder (N = 143,265) from the largest available genome-wide association studies. MR evidence suggested a causal relationship between higher relative carbohydrate intake and lower depression risk (odds ratio, 0.42 for depression per one-standard-deviation increment in relative carbohydrate intake; 95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.62; P = 1.49 × 10−5). Multivariable MR indicated that the protective effect of relative carbohydrate intake on depression persisted after conditioning on other diet compositions. The mediation analysis via two-step MR showed that this effect was partly mediated by body mass index, with a mediated proportion of 15.4% (95% confidence interval, 6.7% to 24.1%). These findings may inform prevention strategies and interventions directed towards relative carbohydrate intake and depression.
Suggested Citation
Shi Yao & Meng Zhang & Shan-Shan Dong & Jia-Hao Wang & Kun Zhang & Jing Guo & Yan Guo & Tie-Lin Yang, 2022.
"Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between relative carbohydrate intake and depression,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1569-1576, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:6:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01412-9
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01412-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:6:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1038_s41562-022-01412-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.