IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v5y2021i9d10.1038_s41562-021-01176-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paranoia and belief updating during the COVID-19 crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Praveen Suthaharan

    (Yale University)

  • Erin J. Reed

    (Yale School of Medicine
    Yale School of Medicine)

  • Pantelis Leptourgos

    (Yale University)

  • Joshua G. Kenney

    (Yale University)

  • Stefan Uddenberg

    (University of Chicago)

  • Christoph D. Mathys

    (Aarhus University
    University of Zurich
    Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
    Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati)

  • Leib Litman

    (CloudResearch)

  • Jonathan Robinson

    (CloudResearch)

  • Aaron J. Moss

    (CloudResearch)

  • Jane R. Taylor

    (Yale University
    Yale University)

  • Stephanie M. Groman

    (Yale University)

  • Philip R. Corlett

    (Yale University
    Yale University
    Yale University)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has made the world seem less predictable. Such crises can lead people to feel that others are a threat. Here, we show that the initial phase of the pandemic in 2020 increased individuals’ paranoia and made their belief updating more erratic. A proactive lockdown made people’s belief updating less capricious. However, state-mandated mask-wearing increased paranoia and induced more erratic behaviour. This was most evident in states where adherence to mask-wearing rules was poor but where rule following is typically more common. Computational analyses of participant behaviour suggested that people with higher paranoia expected the task to be more unstable. People who were more paranoid endorsed conspiracies about mask-wearing and potential vaccines and the QAnon conspiracy theories. These beliefs were associated with erratic task behaviour and changed priors. Taken together, we found that real-world uncertainty increases paranoia and influences laboratory task behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Praveen Suthaharan & Erin J. Reed & Pantelis Leptourgos & Joshua G. Kenney & Stefan Uddenberg & Christoph D. Mathys & Leib Litman & Jonathan Robinson & Aaron J. Moss & Jane R. Taylor & Stephanie M. Gr, 2021. "Paranoia and belief updating during the COVID-19 crisis," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 1190-1202, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01176-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01176-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01176-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-021-01176-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferreira, Simão & Campos, Carlos & Marinho, Beatriz & Rocha, Susana & Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo & Barbosa Rocha, Nuno, 2022. "What drives beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories? The role of psychotic-like experiences and confinement-related factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Yuan, Hang & Long, Qinyi & Huang, Guanglv & Huang, Liqin & Luo, Siyang, 2022. "Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    3. Kohnert, Dirk, 2023. "QAnon and other conspiracy ideologies’ impact on Sub-Saharan Africa in the age of Global capitalism," MPRA Paper 115917, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Kampling, Hanna & Riedl, David & Hettich, Nora & Lampe, Astrid & Nolte, Tobias & Zara, Sandra & Ernst, Mareike & Brähler, Elmar & Sachser, Cedric & Fegert, Jörg M. & Gingelmaier, Stephan & Fonagy, Pet, 2024. "To trust or not to trust in the thrall of the COVID-19 pandemic: Conspiracy endorsement and the role of adverse childhood experiences, epistemic trust, and personality functioning," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Galgali, Madhwa S. & Helm, Peter J. & Arndt, Jamie, 2023. "Feeling too isolated to be vaccinated? The contributing role of subjective interpersonal isolation factors towards COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Kohnert, Dirk, 2023. "L'impact de QAnon et d'autres idéologies du complot sur l'Afrique subsaharienne à l'ère du capitalisme mondial [QAnon and other conspiracy ideologies' impact on Sub-Saharan Africa in the age of Glo," MPRA Paper 115950, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01176-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.