Author
Listed:
- Constance M. Bainbridge
(Harvard University)
- Mila Bertolo
(Harvard University)
- Julie Youngers
(Harvard University
University of British Columbia)
- S. Atwood
(Harvard University
University of Washington)
- Lidya Yurdum
(Harvard University)
- Jan Simson
(Harvard University)
- Kelsie Lopez
(Harvard University
Brown University)
- Feng Xing
(Harvard University
Johns Hopkins University)
- Alia Martin
(Victoria University of Wellington)
- Samuel A. Mehr
(Harvard University
Victoria University of Wellington
Harvard University)
Abstract
Music is characterized by acoustic forms that are predictive of its behavioural functions. For example, adult listeners accurately identify unfamiliar lullabies as infant-directed on the basis of their musical features alone. This property could reflect a function of listeners’ experiences, the basic design of the human mind, or both. Here, we show that US infants (N = 144) relax in response to eight unfamiliar foreign lullabies, relative to matched non-lullaby songs from other foreign societies, as indexed by heart rate, pupillometry and electrodermal activity. They do so consistently throughout the first year of life, suggesting that the response is not a function of their musical experiences, which are limited relative to those of adults. The infants’ parents overwhelmingly chose lullabies as the songs that they would use to calm their fussy infant, despite their unfamiliarity. Together, these findings suggest that infants may be predisposed to respond to common features of lullabies found in different cultures.
Suggested Citation
Constance M. Bainbridge & Mila Bertolo & Julie Youngers & S. Atwood & Lidya Yurdum & Jan Simson & Kelsie Lopez & Feng Xing & Alia Martin & Samuel A. Mehr, 2021.
"Infants relax in response to unfamiliar foreign lullabies,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 256-264, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-020-00963-z
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00963-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-020-00963-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.