IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v5y2021i10d10.1038_s41562-021-01092-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The general fault in our fault lines

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Ruggeri

    (Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
    University of Cambridge)

  • Bojana Većkalov

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Lana Bojanić

    (University of Manchester)

  • Thomas L. Andersen

    (PPR Svendborg, Svendborg Kommune)

  • Sarah Ashcroft-Jones

    (University of Oxford)

  • Nélida Ayacaxli

    (Columbia University)

  • Paula Barea-Arroyo

    (University of Seville)

  • Mari Louise Berge

    (Eötvös Loránd University)

  • Ludvig D. Bjørndal

    (University of Oslo)

  • Aslı Bursalıoğlu

    (Loyola University Chicago)

  • Vanessa Bühler

    (University of Vienna
    University College London)

  • Martin Čadek

    (Leeds Beckett University)

  • Melis Çetinçelik

    (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics)

  • Georgia Clay

    (Technische Universität Dresden)

  • Anna Cortijos-Bernabeu

    (University of Lausanne)

  • Kaja Damnjanović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Tatianna M. Dugue

    (Columbia University)

  • Maya Esberg

    (Columbia University)

  • Celia Esteban-Serna

    (University College London)

  • Ezra N. Felder

    (Columbia University)

  • Maja Friedemann

    (University of Oxford)

  • Darianna I. Frontera-Villanueva

    (University of Puerto Rico)

  • Patricia Gale

    (University of Zagreb)

  • Eduardo Garcia-Garzon

    (Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada)

  • Sandra J. Geiger

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Leya George

    (University College London)

  • Allegra Girardello

    (Columbia University)

  • Aleksandra Gracheva

    (Columbia University
    Paris Institute of Political Studies [SciencesPo])

  • Anastasia Gracheva

    (Columbia University
    Columbia University)

  • Marquis Guillory

    (Columbia University)

  • Marlene Hecht

    (Humboldt University of Berlin)

  • Katharina Herte

    (Utrecht University)

  • Barbora Hubená

    (National Institute of Mental Health)

  • William Ingalls

    (Columbia University)

  • Lea Jakob

    (National Institute of Mental Health
    Charles University)

  • Margo Janssens

    (Tilburg University)

  • Hannes Jarke

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Ondřej Kácha

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Kalina Nikolova Kalinova

    (National Institute of Mental Health)

  • Ralitsa Karakasheva

    (National Institute of Mental Health)

  • Peggah R. Khorrami

    (Columbia University
    Harvard University)

  • Žan Lep

    (University of Ljubljana)

  • Samuel Lins

    (University of Porto)

  • Ingvild S. Lofthus

    (University of Oslo)

  • Salomé Mamede

    (University of Porto)

  • Silvana Mareva

    (University of Cambridge)

  • Mafalda F. Mascarenhas

    (Universidade de Lisboa)

  • Lucy McGill

    (University of Groningen)

  • Sara Morales-Izquierdo

    (University of Warwick)

  • Bettina Moltrecht

    (Anna Freud National Centre and University College London)

  • Tasja S. Mueller

    (University of Groningen)

  • Marzia Musetti

    (University of Padova)

  • Joakim Nelsson

    (Uppsala University)

  • Thiago Otto

    (Columbia University)

  • Alessandro F. Paul

    (Leiden University)

  • Irena Pavlović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Marija B. Petrović

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Dora Popović

    (University of Zagreb)

  • Gerhard M. Prinz

    (Bezirkskrankenhaus Straubing)

  • Josip Razum

    (Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences)

  • Ivaylo Sakelariev

    (National Institute of Mental Health)

  • Vivian Samuels

    (Columbia University)

  • Inés Sanguino

    (University of Oxford)

  • Nicolas Say

    (University of Economics)

  • Jakob Schuck

    (University of Tübingen)

  • Irem Soysal

    (Columbia University)

  • Anna Louise Todsen

    (University of St Andrews)

  • Markus R. Tünte

    (University of Vienna)

  • Milica Vdovic

    (Singidunum University)

  • Jáchym Vintr

    (Charles University)

  • Maja Vovko

    (University of Ljubljana)

  • Marek A. Vranka

    (Charles University)

  • Lisa Wagner

    (University of Zurich)

  • Lauren Wilkins

    (Columbia University)

  • Manou Willems

    (National Institute of Mental Health)

  • Elizabeth Wisdom

    (Columbia University)

  • Aleksandra Yosifova

    (New Bulgarian University)

  • Sandy Zeng

    (Columbia University)

  • Mahmoud A. Ahmed

    (St. Olaf College)

  • Twinkle Dwarkanath

    (Columbia University)

  • Mina Cikara

    (Harvard University)

  • Jeffrey Lees

    (Harvard University
    Clemson University)

  • Tomas Folke

    (Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
    University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Pervading global narratives suggest that political polarization is increasing, yet the accuracy of such group meta-perceptions has been drawn into question. A recent US study suggests that these beliefs are inaccurate and drive polarized beliefs about out-groups. However, it also found that informing people of inaccuracies reduces those negative beliefs. In this work, we explore whether these results generalize to other countries. To achieve this, we replicate two of the original experiments with 10,207 participants across 26 countries. We focus on local group divisions, which we refer to as fault lines. We find broad generalizability for both inaccurate meta-perceptions and reduced negative motive attribution through a simple disclosure intervention. We conclude that inaccurate and negative group meta-perceptions are exhibited in myriad contexts and that informing individuals of their misperceptions can yield positive benefits for intergroup relations. Such generalizability highlights a robust phenomenon with implications for political discourse worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Ruggeri & Bojana Većkalov & Lana Bojanić & Thomas L. Andersen & Sarah Ashcroft-Jones & Nélida Ayacaxli & Paula Barea-Arroyo & Mari Louise Berge & Ludvig D. Bjørndal & Aslı Bursalıoğlu & Vanessa Bü, 2021. "The general fault in our fault lines," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 1369-1380, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:10:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01092-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01092-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Lees & Mina Cikara, 2020. "Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 279-286, March.
    2. Feng Shi & Misha Teplitskiy & Eamon Duede & James A. Evans, 2019. "The wisdom of polarized crowds," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 329-336, April.
    3. Brendan Nyhan, 2020. "Facts and Myths about Misperceptions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 220-236, Summer.
    4. Antonio Duro, Juan & Teixidó-Figueras, Jordi, 2014. "World polarization in carbon emissions, potential conflict and groups: An updated revision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 425-432.
    5. Kai Ruggeri & Sonia Alí & Mari Louise Berge & Giulia Bertoldo & Ludvig D. Bjørndal & Anna Cortijos-Bernabeu & Clair Davison & Emir Demić & Celia Esteban-Serna & Maja Friedemann & Shannon P. Gibson & H, 2020. "Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 622-633, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Ruggeri & Amma Panin & Milica Vdovic & Bojana Većkalov & Nazeer Abdul-Salaam & Jascha Achterberg & Carla Akil & Jolly Amatya & Kanchan Amatya & Thomas Lind Andersen & Sibele D. Aquino & Arjoon Aru, 2022. "The globalizability of temporal discounting," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1386-1397, October.
      • Kai Ruggeri & Amma Panin & Milica Vdovic & Bojana Većkalov & Nazeer Abdul-Salaam & Jascha Achterberg & Carla Akil & Jolly Amatya & Kanchan Amatya & Thomas Lind Andersen & Sibele D Aquino & Arjoon Arun, 2022. "The globalizability of temporal discounting," Post-Print halshs-03903193, HAL.
    2. Kai Ruggeri & Amma Panin & Milica Vdovic & Bojana Većkalov & Nazeer Abdul-Salaam & Jascha Achterberg & Carla Akil & Jolly Amatya & Kanchan Amatya & Thomas Lind Andersen & Sibele D. Aquino & Arjoon Aru, 2022. "The globalizability of temporal discounting," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1386-1397, October.
    3. Bojana Većkalov & Sandra J. Geiger & František Bartoš & Mathew P. White & Bastiaan T. Rutjens & Frenk Harreveld & Federica Stablum & Berkan Akın & Alaa Aldoh & Jinhao Bai & Frida Berglund & Aleša Brat, 2024. "A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1892-1905, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugen Dimant, 2020. "Hate Trumps Love: The Impact of Political Polarization on Social Preferences," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 029, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    2. Jordi Brandts & Isabel Busom & Cristina Lopez-Mayan & Judith Panadés, 2022. "Images Say More Than Just Words: Effectiveness of Visual and Text Communication in Dispelling the Rent–Control Misconception," Working Papers 1322, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Kerim Peren Arin & Juan A. Lacomba & Francisco Lagos & Deni Mazrekaj & Marcel Thum, 2021. "Misperceptions and Fake News during the Covid-19 Pandemic," CESifo Working Paper Series 9066, CESifo.
    4. Evgeny Kagan & Alexander Rybalov, 2022. "Subjective Trusts and Prospects: Some Practical Remarks on Decision Making with Imperfect Information," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    6. Kai Ruggeri & Amma Panin & Milica Vdovic & Bojana Većkalov & Nazeer Abdul-Salaam & Jascha Achterberg & Carla Akil & Jolly Amatya & Kanchan Amatya & Thomas Lind Andersen & Sibele D. Aquino & Arjoon Aru, 2022. "The globalizability of temporal discounting," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1386-1397, October.
    7. Kevin da Silva Castanheira & Madeleine Sharp & A Ross Otto, 2021. "The impact of pandemic-related worry on cognitive functioning and risk-taking," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    9. Elbæk, Christian T. & Lystbæk, Martin Nørhede & Mitkidis, Panagiotis, 2022. "On the psychology of bonuses: The effects of loss aversion and Yerkes-Dodson law on performance in cognitively and mechanically demanding tasks," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Martin-Gutierrez, Samuel & Losada, Juan C. & Benito, Rosa M., 2023. "Multipolar social systems: Measuring polarization beyond dichotomous contexts," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," Munich Papers in Political Economy 27, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    12. Marino, Maria & Iacono, Roberto & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2023. "(Mis-)perceptions, information, and political polarization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Yang, Luhe & Zhang, Lianzhong & Yang, Duoxing, 2022. "Asymmetric micro-dynamics in spatial anonymous public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    14. Iandoli, Luca & Primario, Simonetta & Zollo, Giuseppe, 2021. "The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Brandts, Jordi & Busom, Isabel & Lopez-Mayan, Cristina & Panadés, Judith, 2022. "Dispelling misconceptions about economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Benjamin Monnery & François-Charles Wolff, 2023. "Is participatory democracy in line with social protest? Evidence from the French Yellow Vests movement," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 283-309, October.
    17. Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2023. "Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition: Evidence from representative experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Cori Vilella, 2016. "The global carbon budget: a conflicting claims problem," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 693-703, June.
    19. Ing-Haw Cheng & Alice Hsiaw, 2023. "Bayesian Doublespeak," Working Papers 135, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    20. Dorison, Charles A & Lerner, Jennifer S & Heller, Blake H & Rothman, Alexander J & Kawachi, Ichiro I & Wang, Ke & Rees, Vaughan W & Gill, Brian P & Gibbs, Nancy & Ebersole, Charles R & Vally, Zahir & , 2022. "In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits : Experimental evidence from 84 countries," Other publications TiSEM 235f67b6-6be5-4061-8693-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:10:d:10.1038_s41562-021-01092-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.