IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v4y2020i8d10.1038_s41562-020-0867-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of risky foraging behaviour in healthy young people

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik R. Bach

    (University College London
    University College London
    University of Zurich)

  • Michael Moutoussis

    (University College London
    University College London)

  • Aislinn Bowler

    (University College London
    University College London)

  • Raymond J. Dolan

    (University College London
    University College London)

Abstract

During adolescence and early adulthood, learning when to avoid threats and when to pursue rewards becomes crucial. Using a risky foraging task, we investigated individual differences in this dynamic across 781 individuals aged 14–24 years who were split into a hypothesis-generating discovery sample and a hold-out confirmation sample. Sex was the most important predictor of cautious behaviour and performance. Males earned one standard deviation (or 20%) more reward than females, collected more reward when there was little to lose and reduced foraging to the same level as females when potential losses became high. Other independent predictors of cautiousness and performance were self-reported daringness, IQ and self-reported cognitive complexity. We found no evidence for an impact of age or maturation. Thus, maleness, a high IQ or self-reported cognitive complexity, and self-reported daringness predicted greater success in risky foraging, possibly due to better exploitation of low-risk opportunities in high-risk environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik R. Bach & Michael Moutoussis & Aislinn Bowler & Raymond J. Dolan, 2020. "Predictors of risky foraging behaviour in healthy young people," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(8), pages 832-843, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-020-0867-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0867-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-020-0867-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-020-0867-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.