Author
Listed:
- Jacob L. S. Bellmund
(Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Radboud University)
- William de Cothi
(University College London
University College London)
- Tom A. Ruiter
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology
University of Amsterdam)
- Matthias Nau
(Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
- Caswell Barry
(University College London)
- Christian F. Doeller
(Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
Abstract
Environmental boundaries anchor cognitive maps that support memory. However, trapezoidal boundary geometry distorts the regular firing patterns of entorhinal grid cells, proposedly providing a metric for cognitive maps. Here we test the impact of trapezoidal boundary geometry on human spatial memory using immersive virtual reality. Consistent with reduced regularity of grid patterns in rodents and a grid-cell model based on the eigenvectors of the successor representation, human positional memory was degraded in a trapezoid environment compared with a square environment—an effect that was particularly pronounced in the narrow part of the trapezoid. Congruent with changes in the spatial frequency of eigenvector grid patterns, distance estimates between remembered positions were persistently biased, revealing distorted memory maps that explained behaviour better than the objective maps. Our findings demonstrate that environmental geometry affects human spatial memory in a similar manner to rodent grid-cell activity and, therefore, strengthen the putative link between grid cells and behaviour along with their cognitive functions beyond navigation.
Suggested Citation
Jacob L. S. Bellmund & William de Cothi & Tom A. Ruiter & Matthias Nau & Caswell Barry & Christian F. Doeller, 2020.
"Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 177-188, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-019-0767-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0767-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:4:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1038_s41562-019-0767-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.