Author
Listed:
- Eran Eldar
(University College London
Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research)
- Gyung Jin Bae
(University College London
Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research)
- Zeb Kurth-Nelson
(University College London
Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research)
- Peter Dayan
(Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research
University College London)
- Raymond J. Dolan
(University College London
Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research)
Abstract
When confronted with complex inputs consisting of multiple elements, humans use various strategies to integrate the elements quickly and accurately. For instance, accuracy may be improved by processing elements one at a time1–4 or over extended periods5–8; speed can increase if the internal representation of elements is accelerated9,10. However, little is known about how humans actually approach these challenges because behavioural findings can be accounted for by multiple alternative process models11 and neuroimaging investigations typically rely on haemodynamic signals that change too slowly. Consequently, to uncover the fast neural dynamics that support information integration, we decoded magnetoencephalographic signals that were recorded as human subjects performed a complex decision task. Our findings reveal three sources of individual differences in the temporal structure of the integration process—sequential representation, partial reinstatement and early computation—each having a dissociable effect on how subjects handled problem complexity and temporal constraints. Our findings shed new light on the structure and influence of self-determined neural integration processes.
Suggested Citation
Eran Eldar & Gyung Jin Bae & Zeb Kurth-Nelson & Peter Dayan & Raymond J. Dolan, 2018.
"Magnetoencephalography decoding reveals structural differences within integrative decision processes,"
Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 670-681, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0423-3
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0423-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0423-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.