IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v2y2018i9d10.1038_s41562-018-0415-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley J. Thomas

    (University of California
    Harvard University)

  • Lotte Thomsen

    (University of Oslo
    University of Aarhus)

  • Angela F. Lukowski

    (University of California)

  • Meline Abramyan

    (University of California)

  • Barbara W. Sarnecka

    (University of California)

Abstract

Social hierarchies occur across human societies, so all humans must navigate them. Infants can detect when one individual outranks another1–3, but it is unknown whether they approach others based on their social status. This paper presents a series of seven experiments investigating whether toddlers prefer high- or low-ranking individuals. Toddlers aged 21–31 months watched a zero-sum, right-of-way conflict between two puppets, in which one puppet ‘won’ because the other yielded the way. Of the 23 toddlers who participated, 20 reached for the puppet that ‘won’. However, when one puppet used force and knocked the other puppet down in order to win, 18 out of 22 toddlers reached for the puppet that ‘lost’. Five follow-up experiments ruled out alternative explanations for these results. The findings suggest that humans, from a very early age, not only recognize relative status but also incorporate status into their decisions about whether to approach or avoid others, in a way that differs from our nearest primate relatives4.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley J. Thomas & Lotte Thomsen & Angela F. Lukowski & Meline Abramyan & Barbara W. Sarnecka, 2018. "Toddlers prefer those who win but not when they win by force," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 662-669, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0415-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0415-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0415-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-018-0415-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:9:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0415-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.