IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v2y2018i5d10.1038_s41562-018-0327-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation of children’s strategies for overcoming the tragedy of the commons

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Koomen

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

  • Esther Herrmann

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology)

Abstract

Common-pool resource (CPR) dilemmas are pervasive challenges to overcome. We presented six-year-old children with an experimental CPR paradigm involving a renewable water resource, which children could collect to win individual rewards. To maximize water collection, children had to wait for water to accumulate, without collapsing the resource. We explore the social strategies children used to overcome the dilemma together. Like adults, six-year-old children were challenged by the dilemma: resource sustaining was more successful in a parallel condition in which children worked independently compared with the collective CPR condition. However, children were capable of collectively preventing resource collapse by spontaneously generating inclusive rules, equally distributing the rewards and distracting one another from the delay-of-gratification task. Children also learned to sustain the resource longer in repeated interactions with the same partner. Already by the age of six, children are capable of CPR social strategies resembling those of adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Koomen & Esther Herrmann, 2018. "An investigation of children’s strategies for overcoming the tragedy of the commons," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(5), pages 348-355, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0327-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0327-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0327-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-018-0327-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1038_s41562-018-0327-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.