IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v2y2018i1d10.1038_s41562-017-0271-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population structured by witchcraft beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Mace

    (University College London
    Lanzhou University)

  • Matthew G. Thomas

    (University College London)

  • Jiajia Wu

    (University College London
    Lanzhou University
    Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • QiaoQiao He

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ting Ji

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Yi Tao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Anthropologists have long argued that fear of victimization through witchcraft accusations promotes cooperation in small-scale societies 1 . Others have argued that witchcraft beliefs undermine trust and therefore reduce social cohesion 2 . However, there are very few, if any, quantified empirical examples demonstrating how witchcraft labels can structure cooperation in real human communities. Here we show a case from a farming community in China where people labelled zhu were thought capable of supernatural activity, particularly poisoning food. The label was usually applied to adult women heads of household and often inherited down the female line. We found that those in zhu households were less likely to give or receive gifts or farm help to or from non-zhu households; nor did they have sexual partnerships or children with those in non-zhu households. However, those in zhu households did preferentially help and reproduce with each other. Although the tag is common knowledge to other villagers and used in cooperative and reproductive partner choice, we found no evidence that this assortment was based on cooperativeness or quality. We favour the explanation that stigmatization originally arose as a mechanism to harm female competitors. Once established, fear that the trait is transmissible may help explain the persistence of this deep-rooted cultural belief.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Mace & Matthew G. Thomas & Jiajia Wu & QiaoQiao He & Ting Ji & Yi Tao, 2018. "Population structured by witchcraft beliefs," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 39-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0271-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0271-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0271-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-017-0271-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boris Gershman, 2022. "Witchcraft Beliefs Around the World: An Exploratory Analysis," Working Papers 2022-06, American University, Department of Economics.
    2. Boris Gershman, 2021. "Witchcraft Beliefs, Social Relations, and Development," Working Papers 2021-01, American University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:2:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0271-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.