IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v1y2017i1d10.1038_s41562-016-0005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden

Author

Listed:
  • Avshalom Caspi

    (Duke University
    Duke University School of Medicine
    Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University
    Social, Genetic, & Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College London)

  • Renate M. Houts

    (Duke University)

  • Daniel W. Belsky

    (Duke University School of Medicine
    Social Science Research Institute, Duke University)

  • Honalee Harrington

    (Duke University)

  • Sean Hogan

    (University of Otago)

  • Sandhya Ramrakha

    (University of Otago)

  • Richie Poulton

    (University of Otago)

  • Terrie E. Moffitt

    (Duke University
    Duke University School of Medicine
    Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University
    Social, Genetic, & Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College London)

Abstract

Policymakers are interested in early-years interventions to ameliorate childhood risks. They hope for improved adult outcomes in the long run that bring a return on investment. The size of the return that can be expected partly depends on how strongly childhood risks forecast adult outcomes, but there is disagreement about whether childhood determines adulthood. We integrated multiple nationwide administrative databases and electronic medical records with the four-decade-long Dunedin birth cohort study to test child-to-adult prediction in a different way, using a population-segmentation approach. A segment comprising 22% of the cohort accounted for 36% of the cohort’s injury insurance claims; 40% of excess obese kilograms; 54% of cigarettes smoked; 57% of hospital nights; 66% of welfare benefits; 77% of fatherless child-rearing; 78% of prescription fills; and 81% of criminal convictions. Childhood risks, including poor brain health at three years of age, predicted this segment with large effect sizes. Early-years interventions that are effective for this population segment could yield very large returns on investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Avshalom Caspi & Renate M. Houts & Daniel W. Belsky & Honalee Harrington & Sean Hogan & Sandhya Ramrakha & Richie Poulton & Terrie E. Moffitt, 2017. "Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-016-0005
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0005
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-016-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yayouk E. Willems & Jian-Bin Li & Anne M. Hendriks & Meike Bartels & Catrin Finkenauer, 2018. "The Relationship between Family Violence and Self-Control in Adolescence: A Multi-Level Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41562-016-0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.