IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natene/v5y2020i10d10.1038_s41560-020-00691-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Startups supported by ARPA-E were more innovative than others but an investment gap may remain

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Goldstein

    (University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
    Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs)

  • Claudia Doblinger

    (Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability and School of Management)

  • Erin Baker

    (University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering)

  • Laura Díaz Anadón

    (Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
    University of Cambridge, Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resource Governance, Department of Land Economy)

Abstract

Startups funded by the US Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy filed patents at twice the rate of similar cleantech firms. The high-risk high-reward funding model has succeeded in advancing energy technology, but more is needed to help these innovative firms cross the valley of death and bring new cleantech products to market.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Goldstein & Claudia Doblinger & Erin Baker & Laura Díaz Anadón, 2020. "Startups supported by ARPA-E were more innovative than others but an investment gap may remain," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 741-742, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:5:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1038_s41560-020-00691-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-00691-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-020-00691-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41560-020-00691-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:5:y:2020:i:10:d:10.1038_s41560-020-00691-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.