Author
Listed:
- Gergo Ignacz
(King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST))
- Aron K. Beke
(King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST))
- Viktor Toth
(King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST))
- Gyorgy Szekely
(King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST))
Abstract
Accurate energy system modelling of chemical separations is a critical component of technology selection to minimize operating costs, energy consumption and emissions. Here we report a hybrid modelling approach based on data-driven and mechanistic models to holistically compare chemical separation performance. Our model can be used to select the most suitable technology for a given chemical separation, such as membrane separation, evaporation, extraction or hybrid configurations, by training a machine learning model to predict solute rejection using an open-access membrane dataset. We estimated an average 40% reduction in energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions for industrially relevant separations using our methodology. We predicted and analysed 7.1 million solute rejections across several industrial sectors. Pharmaceutical purification could realize carbon dioxide emissions reductions of up to 90% by selecting the most efficient technology. We mapped the reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and the reduction in operating costs globally, establishing parameter thresholds to facilitate corporate and governmental decision-making.
Suggested Citation
Gergo Ignacz & Aron K. Beke & Viktor Toth & Gyorgy Szekely, 2025.
"A hybrid modelling approach to compare chemical separation technologies in terms of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions,"
Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(3), pages 308-317, March.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natene:v:10:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01668-7
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-024-01668-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:10:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01668-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.