Author
Listed:
- Ran Li
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Hao Li
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Wentao Huang
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai ChangXing Ocean Laboratory)
- Hanqi Tao
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Weiwu Xu
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Nengling Tai
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
- Canbing Li
(Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Shanghai Jiao Tong University)
Abstract
The decarbonization of marine transport is a global challenge due to the range and capacity limitations of renewable ships. Offshore charging stations have emerged as an innovative solution, despite increased investment and extended voyage durations. Here we develop a route-specific model for the optimal placement and sizing of offshore charging stations to assess their economic, environmental and operational impacts. Analysing 34 global and regional shipping routes, we find that offshore charging stations can reduce the cost for electric ships by US$0.3–1.6 (MW km)−1 and greenhouse gas emissions by 1.04–8.91 kg (MW km)−1 by 2050. The economic cruising range for 6,500 20-foot equivalent unit electric ships can increase from 3,000 km to 9,000 km. Voyage time costs for these enhancements vary between a 0% and 30% grace period of the original delivery time frame. We further investigate power-to-ammonia offshore refuelling stations as a proxy for e-fuels, which could potentially replace heavy fuel oil ships for routes over 9,000 km with only a 5% grace period.
Suggested Citation
Ran Li & Hao Li & Wentao Huang & Hanqi Tao & Weiwu Xu & Nengling Tai & Canbing Li, 2025.
"Accelerating green shipping with spatially optimized offshore charging stations,"
Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(2), pages 243-254, February.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natene:v:10:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01692-7
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-024-01692-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:10:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1038_s41560-024-01692-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.