IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v9y2018i1d10.1038_s41467-018-06987-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implicit preference for human trustworthy faces in macaque monkeys

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Costa

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

  • Alice Gomez

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

  • Elodie Barat

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

  • Guillaume Lio

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

  • Jean-René Duhamel

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

  • Angela Sirigu

    (Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, UCBL, Lyon 1)

Abstract

It has been shown that human judgements of trustworthiness are based on subtle processing of specific facial features. However, it is not known if this ability is a specifically human function, or whether it is shared among primates. Here we report that macaque monkeys (Macaca Mulatta and Macaca Fascicularis), like humans, display a preferential attention to trustworthiness-associated facial cues in computer-generated human faces. Monkeys looked significantly longer at faces categorized a priori as trustworthy compared to untrustworthy. In addition, spatial sequential analysis of monkeys’ initial saccades revealed an upward shift with attention moving to the eye region for trustworthy faces while no change was observed for the untrustworthy ones. Finally, we found significant correlations between facial width-to-height ratio– a morphometric feature that predicts trustworthiness’ judgments in humans – and looking time in both species. These findings suggest the presence of common mechanisms among primates for first impression of trustworthiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Costa & Alice Gomez & Elodie Barat & Guillaume Lio & Jean-René Duhamel & Angela Sirigu, 2018. "Implicit preference for human trustworthy faces in macaque monkeys," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-06987-4
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06987-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06987-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-018-06987-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-06987-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.