Author
Listed:
- Anjana Srivatsan
(University of California School of Medicine)
- Bin-Zhong Li
(University of California School of Medicine)
- Barnabas Szakal
(The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation)
- Dana Branzei
(The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation
Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR))
- Christopher D. Putnam
(University of California School of Medicine
University of California School of Medicine)
- Richard D. Kolodner
(University of California School of Medicine
University of California School of Medicine
University of California School of Medicine
University of California School of Medicine)
Abstract
Genome instability is associated with tumorigenesis. Here, we identify a role for the histone Htz1, which is deposited by the Swr1 chromatin-remodeling complex (SWR-C), in preventing genome instability in the absence of the replication fork/replication checkpoint proteins Mrc1, Csm3, or Tof1. When combined with deletion of SWR1 or HTZ1, deletion of MRC1, CSM3, or TOF1 or a replication-defective mrc1 mutation causes synergistic increases in gross chromosomal rearrangement (GCR) rates, accumulation of a broad spectrum of GCRs, and hypersensitivity to replication stress. The double mutants have severe replication defects and accumulate aberrant replication intermediates. None of the individual mutations cause large increases in GCR rates; however, defects in MRC1, CSM3 or TOF1 cause activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and replication defects. We propose a model in which Htz1 deposition and retention in chromatin prevents transiently stalled replication forks that occur in mrc1, tof1, or csm3 mutants from being converted to DNA double-strand breaks that trigger genome instability.
Suggested Citation
Anjana Srivatsan & Bin-Zhong Li & Barnabas Szakal & Dana Branzei & Christopher D. Putnam & Richard D. Kolodner, 2018.
"The Swr1 chromatin-remodeling complex prevents genome instability induced by replication fork progression defects,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-06131-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06131-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-06131-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.