IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v9y2018i1d10.1038_s41467-018-05555-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthetic microbe communities provide internal reference standards for metagenome sequencing and analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Simon A. Hardwick

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    UNSW Sydney)

  • Wendy Y. Chen

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    UNSW Sydney)

  • Ted Wong

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research)

  • Bindu S. Kanakamedala

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research)

  • Ira W. Deveson

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    UNSW Sydney)

  • Sarah E. Ongley

    (UNSW Sydney
    The University of Newcastle)

  • Nadia S. Santini

    (Centre for Marine Bioinnovation UNSW Sydney
    Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico)

  • Esteban Marcellin

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Martin A. Smith

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    UNSW Sydney)

  • Lars K. Nielsen

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Catherine E. Lovelock

    (The University of Queensland)

  • Brett A. Neilan

    (UNSW Sydney
    The University of Newcastle)

  • Tim R. Mercer

    (Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    UNSW Sydney
    Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences)

Abstract

The complexity of microbial communities, combined with technical biases in next-generation sequencing, pose a challenge to metagenomic analysis. Here, we develop a set of internal DNA standards, termed “sequins” (sequencing spike-ins), that together constitute a synthetic community of artificial microbial genomes. Sequins are added to environmental DNA samples prior to library preparation, and undergo concurrent sequencing with the accompanying sample. We validate the performance of sequins by comparison to mock microbial communities, and demonstrate their use in the analysis of real metagenome samples. We show how sequins can be used to measure fold change differences in the size and structure of accompanying microbial communities, and perform quantitative normalization between samples. We further illustrate how sequins can be used to benchmark and optimize new methods, including nanopore long-read sequencing technology. We provide metagenome sequins, along with associated data sets, protocols, and an accompanying software toolkit, as reference standards to aid in metagenomic studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon A. Hardwick & Wendy Y. Chen & Ted Wong & Bindu S. Kanakamedala & Ira W. Deveson & Sarah E. Ongley & Nadia S. Santini & Esteban Marcellin & Martin A. Smith & Lars K. Nielsen & Catherine E. Lovelo, 2018. "Synthetic microbe communities provide internal reference standards for metagenome sequencing and analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-05555-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05555-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05555-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-018-05555-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen M. Gunter & Scott E. Youlten & Andre L. M. Reis & Tim McCubbin & Bindu Swapna Madala & Ted Wong & Igor Stevanovski & Arcadi Cipponi & Ira W. Deveson & Nadia S. Santini & Sarah Kummerfeld & Peter, 2024. "A universal molecular control for DNA, mRNA and protein expression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Helen M. Gunter & Scott E. Youlten & Bindu Swapna Madala & Andre L. M. Reis & Igor Stevanovski & Ted Wong & Sarah K. Kummerfield & Ira W. Deveson & Nadia S. Santini & Esteban Marcellin & Tim R. Mercer, 2022. "Library adaptors with integrated reference controls improve the accuracy and reliability of nanopore sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-05555-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.