IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v9y2018i1d10.1038_s41467-018-02984-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a consistent modeling framework to assess multi-sectoral climate impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Erwan Monier

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Sergey Paltsev

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Andrei Sokolov

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Y.-H. Henry Chen

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Xiang Gao

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Qudsia Ejaz

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Evan Couzo

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    One University Heights)

  • C. Adam Schlosser

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Stephanie Dutkiewicz

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Charles Fant

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Jeffery Scott

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • David Kicklighter

    (Marine Biological Laboratory)

  • Jennifer Morris

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Henry Jacoby

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Ronald Prinn

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Martin Haigh

    (Shell Centre)

Abstract

Efforts to estimate the physical and economic impacts of future climate change face substantial challenges. To enrich the currently popular approaches to impact analysis—which involve evaluation of a damage function or multi-model comparisons based on a limited number of standardized scenarios—we propose integrating a geospatially resolved physical representation of impacts into a coupled human-Earth system modeling framework. Large internationally coordinated exercises cannot easily respond to new policy targets and the implementation of standard scenarios across models, institutions and research communities can yield inconsistent estimates. Here, we argue for a shift toward the use of a self-consistent integrated modeling framework to assess climate impacts, and discuss ways the integrated assessment modeling community can move in this direction. We then demonstrate the capabilities of such a modeling framework by conducting a multi-sectoral assessment of climate impacts under a range of consistent and integrated economic and climate scenarios that are responsive to new policies and business expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Erwan Monier & Sergey Paltsev & Andrei Sokolov & Y.-H. Henry Chen & Xiang Gao & Qudsia Ejaz & Evan Couzo & C. Adam Schlosser & Stephanie Dutkiewicz & Charles Fant & Jeffery Scott & David Kicklighter &, 2018. "Toward a consistent modeling framework to assess multi-sectoral climate impacts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-02984-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02984-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-02984-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-018-02984-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franzke, Christian L.E., 2021. "Towards the development of economic damage functions for weather and climate extremes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Miller, J. Isaac & Brock, William A., 2024. "Beyond RCP8.5: Marginal mitigation using quasi-representative concentration pathways," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-02984-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.