Author
Listed:
- Kieran A. Bates
(Imperial College London
Zoological Society of London)
- Frances C. Clare
(Zoological Society of London)
- Simon O’Hanlon
(Imperial College London)
- Jaime Bosch
(CSIC)
- Lola Brookes
(Zoological Society of London)
- Kevin Hopkins
(Zoological Society of London)
- Emilia J. McLaughlin
(Zoological Society of London)
- Olivia Daniel
(Imperial College London)
- Trenton W. J. Garner
(Zoological Society of London)
- Matthew C. Fisher
(Imperial College London)
- Xavier A. Harrison
(Zoological Society of London)
Abstract
Host-associated microbes are vital for combatting infections and maintaining health. In amphibians, certain skin-associated bacteria inhibit the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), yet our understanding of host microbial ecology and its role in disease outbreaks is limited. We sampled skin-associated bacteria and Bd from Pyrenean midwife toad populations exhibiting enzootic or epizootic disease dynamics. We demonstrate that bacterial communities differ between life stages with few shared taxa, indicative of restructuring at metamorphosis. We detected a significant effect of infection history on metamorph skin microbiota, with reduced bacterial diversity in epizootic populations and differences in community structure and predicted function. Genome sequencing of Bd isolates supports a single introduction to the Pyrenees and reveals no association between pathogen genetics and epidemiological trends. Our findings provide an ecologically relevant insight into the microbial ecology of amphibian skin and highlight the relative importance of host microbiota and pathogen genetics in predicting disease outcome.
Suggested Citation
Kieran A. Bates & Frances C. Clare & Simon O’Hanlon & Jaime Bosch & Lola Brookes & Kevin Hopkins & Emilia J. McLaughlin & Olivia Daniel & Trenton W. J. Garner & Matthew C. Fisher & Xavier A. Harrison, 2018.
"Amphibian chytridiomycosis outbreak dynamics are linked with host skin bacterial community structure,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-02967-w
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02967-w
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:9:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-018-02967-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.