IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v8y2017i1d10.1038_ncomms14494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climbing favours the tripod gait over alternative faster insect gaits

Author

Listed:
  • Pavan Ramdya

    (Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Microengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
    Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne
    Present address: Department of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91106, USA)

  • Robin Thandiackal

    (Biorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

  • Raphael Cherney

    (Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Microengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
    Present address: Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA)

  • Thibault Asselborn

    (Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Microengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

  • Richard Benton

    (Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne)

  • Auke Jan Ijspeert

    (Biorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

  • Dario Floreano

    (Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Microengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)

Abstract

To escape danger or catch prey, running vertebrates rely on dynamic gaits with minimal ground contact. By contrast, most insects use a tripod gait that maintains at least three legs on the ground at any given time. One prevailing hypothesis for this difference in fast locomotor strategies is that tripod locomotion allows insects to rapidly navigate three-dimensional terrain. To test this, we computationally discovered fast locomotor gaits for a model based on Drosophila melanogaster. Indeed, the tripod gait emerges to the exclusion of many other possible gaits when optimizing fast upward climbing with leg adhesion. By contrast, novel two-legged bipod gaits are fastest on flat terrain without adhesion in the model and in a hexapod robot. Intriguingly, when adhesive leg structures in real Drosophila are covered, animals exhibit atypical bipod-like leg coordination. We propose that the requirement to climb vertical terrain may drive the prevalence of the tripod gait over faster alternative gaits with minimal ground contact.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavan Ramdya & Robin Thandiackal & Raphael Cherney & Thibault Asselborn & Richard Benton & Auke Jan Ijspeert & Dario Floreano, 2017. "Climbing favours the tripod gait over alternative faster insect gaits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14494
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14494
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms14494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serrano, S. & Barrio, R. & Lozano, Á. & Mayora-Cebollero, A. & Vigara, R., 2024. "Coupling of neurons favors the bursting behavior and the predominance of the tripod gait," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms14494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.