IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v7y2016i1d10.1038_ncomms12110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cortical idiosyncrasies predict the perception of object size

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Moutsiana

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London
    Kingston University)

  • Benjamin de Haas

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London
    UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience)

  • Andriani Papageorgiou

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London)

  • Jelle A. van Dijk

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London
    UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience)

  • Annika Balraj

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London
    Columbian College of Arts and Sciences, The George Washington University)

  • John A. Greenwood

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London)

  • D. Samuel Schwarzkopf

    (Experimental Psychology, University College London
    UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience)

Abstract

Perception is subjective. Even basic judgments, like those of visual object size, vary substantially between observers and also across the visual field within the same observer. The way in which the visual system determines the size of objects remains unclear, however. We hypothesize that object size is inferred from neuronal population activity in V1 and predict that idiosyncrasies in cortical functional architecture should therefore explain individual differences in size judgments. Here we show results from novel behavioural methods and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) demonstrating that biases in size perception are correlated with the spatial tuning of neuronal populations in healthy volunteers. To explain this relationship, we formulate a population read-out model that directly links the spatial distribution of V1 representations to our perceptual experience of visual size. Taken together, our results suggest that the individual perception of simple stimuli is warped by idiosyncrasies in visual cortical organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Moutsiana & Benjamin de Haas & Andriani Papageorgiou & Jelle A. van Dijk & Annika Balraj & John A. Greenwood & D. Samuel Schwarzkopf, 2016. "Cortical idiosyncrasies predict the perception of object size," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms12110
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12110
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms12110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gizem Y Yildiz & Irene Sperandio & Christine Kettle & Philippe A Chouinard, 2019. "The contribution of linear perspective cues and texture gradients in the perceptual rescaling of stimuli inside a Ponzo illusion corridor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms12110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.