Author
Listed:
- Chengjin Chu
(SYSU-Alberta Joint Lab for Biodiversity Conservation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University
Utah State University)
- Andrew R. Kleinhesselink
(Utah State University)
- Kris M. Havstad
(USDA, ARS, Jornada Experimental Range and Jornada Basin Long Term Ecological Research, New Mexico State University)
- Mitchel P. McClaran
(School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA)
- Debra P. Peters
(USDA, ARS, Jornada Experimental Range and Jornada Basin Long Term Ecological Research, New Mexico State University)
- Lance T. Vermeire
(USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, Montana 59301, USA)
- Haiyan Wei
(School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA)
- Peter B. Adler
(Utah State University)
Abstract
Theory predicts that strong indirect effects of environmental change will impact communities when niche differences between competitors are small and variation in the direct effects experienced by competitors is large, but empirical tests are lacking. Here we estimate negative frequency dependence, a proxy for niche differences, and quantify the direct and indirect effects of climate change on each species. Consistent with theory, in four of five communities indirect effects are strongest for species showing weak negative frequency dependence. Indirect effects are also stronger in communities where there is greater variation in direct effects. Overall responses to climate perturbations are driven primarily by direct effects, suggesting that single species models may be adequate for forecasting the impacts of climate change in these communities.
Suggested Citation
Chengjin Chu & Andrew R. Kleinhesselink & Kris M. Havstad & Mitchel P. McClaran & Debra P. Peters & Lance T. Vermeire & Haiyan Wei & Peter B. Adler, 2016.
"Direct effects dominate responses to climate perturbations in grassland plant communities,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, September.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms11766
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11766
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms11766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.