IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v7y2016i1d10.1038_ncomms11042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation

Author

Listed:
  • E. Hammill

    (School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland
    Utah State University)

  • A. I. T. Tulloch

    (School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland)

  • H. P. Possingham

    (School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland
    Imperial College London)

  • N. Strange

    (Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate Change, University of Copenhagen)

  • K. A. Wilson

    (School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland)

Abstract

The high incidence of armed conflicts in biodiverse regions poses significant challenges in achieving international conservation targets. Because attitudes towards risk vary, we assessed different strategies for protected area planning that reflected alternative attitudes towards the risk of armed conflicts. We find that ignoring conflict risk will deliver the lowest return on investment. Opting to completely avoid conflict-prone areas offers limited improvements and could lead to species receiving no protection. Accounting for conflict by protecting additional areas to offset the impacts of armed conflicts would not only increase the return on investment (an effect that is enhanced when high-risk areas are excluded) but also increase upfront conservation costs. Our results also demonstrate that fine-scale estimations of conflict risk could enhance the cost-effectiveness of investments. We conclude that achieving biodiversity targets in volatile regions will require greater initial investment and benefit from fine-resolution estimates of conflict risk.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Hammill & A. I. T. Tulloch & H. P. Possingham & N. Strange & K. A. Wilson, 2016. "Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms11042
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11042
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms11042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:7:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms11042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.