Author
Listed:
- Xoana G. Troncoso
(Barrow Neurological Institute
UNIC-CNRS (Unité de Neuroscience Information et Complexité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique))
- Michael B. McCamy
(Barrow Neurological Institute)
- Ali Najafian Jazi
(Barrow Neurological Institute
Program in Neuroscience, Arizona State University)
- Jie Cui
(Barrow Neurological Institute)
- Jorge Otero-Millan
(Barrow Neurological Institute
Johns Hopkins University)
- Stephen L. Macknik
(Barrow Neurological Institute
State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center)
- Francisco M. Costela
(Barrow Neurological Institute
Program in Neuroscience, Arizona State University)
- Susana Martinez-Conde
(Barrow Neurological Institute
State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center)
Abstract
How does the visual system differentiate self-generated motion from motion in the external world? Humans can discern object motion from identical retinal image displacements induced by eye movements, but the brain mechanisms underlying this ability are unknown. Here we exploit the frequent production of microsaccades during ocular fixation in the primate to compare primary visual cortical responses to self-generated motion (real microsaccades) versus motion in the external world (object motion mimicking microsaccades). Real and simulated microsaccades were randomly interleaved in the same viewing condition, thereby producing equivalent oculomotor and behavioural engagement. Our results show that real microsaccades generate biphasic neural responses, consisting of a rapid increase in the firing rate followed by a slow and smaller-amplitude suppression that drops below baseline. Simulated microsaccades generate solely excitatory responses. These findings indicate that V1 neurons can respond differently to internally and externally generated motion, and expand V1’s potential role in information processing and visual stability during eye movements.
Suggested Citation
Xoana G. Troncoso & Michael B. McCamy & Ali Najafian Jazi & Jie Cui & Jorge Otero-Millan & Stephen L. Macknik & Francisco M. Costela & Susana Martinez-Conde, 2015.
"V1 neurons respond differently to object motion versus motion from eye movements,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9114
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9114
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms9114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.