Author
Listed:
- Christopher A. Desjardins
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
- Neil D. Sanscrainte
(USDA, ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology)
- Jonathan M. Goldberg
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
- David Heiman
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
- Sarah Young
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
- Qiandong Zeng
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
- Hiten D. Madhani
(University of California-San Francisco)
- James J. Becnel
(USDA, ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology)
- Christina A Cuomo
(Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)
Abstract
Obligate intracellular pathogens depend on their host for growth yet must also evade detection by host defenses. Here we investigate host adaptation in two Microsporidia, the specialist Edhazardia aedis and the generalist Vavraia culicis, pathogens of disease vector mosquitoes. Genomic analysis and deep RNA-Seq across infection time courses reveal fundamental differences between these pathogens. E. aedis retains enhanced cell surface modification and signalling capacity, upregulating protein trafficking and secretion dynamically during infection. V. culicis is less dependent on its host for basic metabolites and retains a subset of spliceosomal components, with a transcriptome broadly focused on growth and replication. Transcriptional profiling of mosquito immune responses reveals that response to infection by E. aedis differs dramatically depending on the mode of infection, and that antimicrobial defensins may play a general role in mosquito defense against Microsporidia. This analysis illuminates fundamentally different evolutionary paths and host interplay of specialist and generalist pathogens.
Suggested Citation
Christopher A. Desjardins & Neil D. Sanscrainte & Jonathan M. Goldberg & David Heiman & Sarah Young & Qiandong Zeng & Hiten D. Madhani & James J. Becnel & Christina A Cuomo, 2015.
"Contrasting host–pathogen interactions and genome evolution in two generalist and specialist microsporidian pathogens of mosquitoes,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8121
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8121
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms8121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.