IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v6y2015i1d10.1038_ncomms7822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibrating genomic and allelic coverage bias in single-cell sequencing

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Zhong Zhang

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT)

  • Viktor A. Adalsteinsson

    (Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Joshua Francis

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT)

  • Hauke Cornils

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Harvard Medical School)

  • Joonil Jung

    (Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT)

  • Cecile Maire

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)

  • Keith L. Ligon

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Harvard Medical School
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital
    Boston Children’s Hospital)

  • Matthew Meyerson

    (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
    Harvard Medical School
    Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana Farber Cancer Institute)

  • J. Christopher Love

    (Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Artifacts introduced in whole-genome amplification (WGA) make it difficult to derive accurate genomic information from single-cell genomes and require different analytical strategies from bulk genome analysis. Here, we describe statistical methods to quantitatively assess the amplification bias resulting from whole-genome amplification of single-cell genomic DNA. Analysis of single-cell DNA libraries generated by different technologies revealed universal features of the genome coverage bias predominantly generated at the amplicon level (1–10 kb). The magnitude of coverage bias can be accurately calibrated from low-pass sequencing (∼0.1 × ) to predict the depth-of-coverage yield of single-cell DNA libraries sequenced at arbitrary depths. We further provide a benchmark comparison of single-cell libraries generated by multi-strand displacement amplification (MDA) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC). Finally, we develop statistical models to calibrate allelic bias in single-cell whole-genome amplification and demonstrate a census-based strategy for efficient and accurate variant detection from low-input biopsy samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Zhong Zhang & Viktor A. Adalsteinsson & Joshua Francis & Hauke Cornils & Joonil Jung & Cecile Maire & Keith L. Ligon & Matthew Meyerson & J. Christopher Love, 2015. "Calibrating genomic and allelic coverage bias in single-cell sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms7822
    DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7822
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/ncomms7822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:6:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1038_ncomms7822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.