Author
Listed:
- Heidi Fischer
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Lei Qian
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Zhuoxin Li
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Katia Bruxvoort
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California
University of Alabama at Birmingham)
- Jacek Skarbinski
(Kaiser Permanente Northern California
Kaiser Permanente Northern California)
- Yuching Ni
(Kaiser Permanente Northern California)
- Jennifer H. Ku
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Bruno Lewin
(Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine)
- Saadiq Garba
(Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine)
- Parag Mahale
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Sally F. Shaw
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Brigitte Spence
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)
- Sara Y. Tartof
(Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine)
Abstract
California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell’s C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.
Suggested Citation
Heidi Fischer & Lei Qian & Zhuoxin Li & Katia Bruxvoort & Jacek Skarbinski & Yuching Ni & Jennifer H. Ku & Bruno Lewin & Saadiq Garba & Parag Mahale & Sally F. Shaw & Brigitte Spence & Sara Y. Tartof, 2025.
"Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58775-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58775-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.