Author
Listed:
- Lisa Willemsen
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Jiyeun Lee
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Pramod Shinde
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Ferran Soldevila
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Minori Aoki
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Shelby Orfield
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Mari Kojima
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Ricardo Silva Antunes
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Alessandro Sette
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
- Bjoern Peters
(La Jolla Institute for Immunology
University of California San Diego)
Abstract
Outbreaks of Bordetella pertussis (BP), the causative agent of whooping cough, continue despite broad vaccination coverage and have been increasing since vaccination switched from whole-BP (wP) to acellular BP (aP) vaccines. wP vaccination has been associated with more durable protective immunity and an induced Th1 polarized memory T cell response. Here, we profile, by a multi-omics approach, the immune response of 30 wP and 31 aP-primed individuals and identify correlates of T cell polarization before and after Tdap booster vaccination. We find that early transcriptional changes indicating an interferon response, followed by an increase in plasma IFN-γ and interferon-induced chemokine levels (peaking at day 1-3 post-booster), correlate best with the Th1 polarization of the vaccine-induced memory T cell response on day 28. Our studies indicate that wP-primed individuals maintain their Th1 polarization through this early memory interferon response. This suggests that stimulating the interferon pathway during vaccination could be an effective strategy to elicit a predominant Th1 response in aP-primed individuals that protects better against infection.
Suggested Citation
Lisa Willemsen & Jiyeun Lee & Pramod Shinde & Ferran Soldevila & Minori Aoki & Shelby Orfield & Mari Kojima & Ricardo Silva Antunes & Alessandro Sette & Bjoern Peters, 2025.
"Th1 polarization in Bordetella pertussis vaccine responses is maintained through a positive feedback loop,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58460-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58460-8
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58460-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.