IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-58440-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer: the phase II Neo-Pembro trial

Author

Listed:
  • S. L. Aronson

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute
    The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • B. Thijssen

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute
    Oncode Institute)

  • M. Lopez-Yurda

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • S. N. Koole

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute
    The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • P. Leest

    (Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • A. León-Castillo

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • R. Harkes

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • I. M. Seignette

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • J. Sanders

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • M. Alkemade

    (Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • I. Kemper

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • M. J. Holtkamp

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • I. A. M. Mandjes

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • A. Broeks

    (Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • M. J. Lahaye

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute
    Maastricht University)

  • M. A. Rijlaarsdam

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • D. Broek

    (Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • L. F. A. Wessels

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute
    Oncode Institute)

  • H. M. Horlings

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • W. J. Driel

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

  • G. S. Sonke

    (The Netherlands Cancer Institute)

Abstract

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, their efficacy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) remains limited. Some patients, however, achieve lasting responses, emphasizing the need to understand how tumor microenvironment and molecular characteristics influence ICI response. The phase 2 Neo-Pembro study (NCT03126812) included 33 untreated stage IV HGSOC patients, who were scheduled for 6 cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel and interval cytoreductive surgery. Pembrolizumab (pembro) was added from cycle two and continued for one year. The primary objective was to assess intratumoral immune activation using multiplexed immunofluorescence and immune-related gene expression. Our findings show immune activation, evidenced by an increase in CD3 + , CD8 + , CD8 + /FOXP3+ ratio, TNF-α and interferon-γ signaling. Treatment was well-tolerated. We observed major pathologic responses in 9/33 patients (27%, 95%CI 14-46), with pathologic response strongly associated with immune activation and OS. At a median follow-up of 52.8 months, 8/9 major responders were alive, with 6 patients recurrence-free. In contrast, 4/24 minor responders survived, including one recurrence-free. ctDNA clearance was observed in all major responders and was associated with prolonged PFS and OS. PD-L1 expression and homologous recombination deficiency were predictive of major response and may serve as biomarkers, warranting further exploration. These results suggest major responders may benefit from neo-adjuvant pembro.

Suggested Citation

  • S. L. Aronson & B. Thijssen & M. Lopez-Yurda & S. N. Koole & P. Leest & A. León-Castillo & R. Harkes & I. M. Seignette & J. Sanders & M. Alkemade & I. Kemper & M. J. Holtkamp & I. A. M. Mandjes & A. B, 2025. "Neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab in stage IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer: the phase II Neo-Pembro trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58440-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58440-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58440-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-58440-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58440-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.