Author
Listed:
- Jennifer M. Podgorski
(University of Connecticut)
- Joshua Podgorski
(University of Connecticut)
- Lawrence Abad
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Deborah Jacobs-Sera
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Krista G. Freeman
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Colin Brown
(San Diego State University)
- Graham F. Hatfull
(University of Pittsburgh)
- Antoni Luque
(University of Miami
University of Miami)
- Simon J. White
(University of Connecticut)
Abstract
Tailed bacteriophages are one of the most numerous and diverse group of viruses. They store their genome at quasi-crystalline densities in capsids built from multiple copies of proteins adopting the HK97-fold. The high density of the genome exerts an internal pressure, requiring a maturation process that reinforces their capsids. However, it is unclear how capsid stabilization strategies have adapted to accommodate the evolution of larger genomes in this virus group. Here we characterize a capsid reinforcement mechanism in two evolutionary-related actinobacteriophages that modifies the length of a stabilization protein to accommodate a larger genome while maintaining the same capsid size. We use cryo-EM to reveal that capsids contain split hexamers of HK97-fold proteins with a stabilization protein in the chasm. The observation of split hexamers in mature capsids is unprecedented, so we rationalize this result mathematically, discovering that icosahedral capsids can be formed by all split or skewed hexamers as long as their T-number is not a multiple of three. Our results suggest that analogous stabilization mechanisms can be present in other icosahedral capsids, and they provide a strategy for engineering capsids accommodating larger DNA cargoes as gene delivery systems.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer M. Podgorski & Joshua Podgorski & Lawrence Abad & Deborah Jacobs-Sera & Krista G. Freeman & Colin Brown & Graham F. Hatfull & Antoni Luque & Simon J. White, 2025.
"Stabilization mechanism accommodating genome length variation in evolutionarily related viral capsids,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58298-0
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58298-0
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58298-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.