IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-58137-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CUT&Tag recovers up to half of ENCODE ChIP-seq histone acetylation peaks

Author

Listed:
  • Leyla Abbasova

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
    Imperial College London)

  • Paulina Urbanaviciute

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at King’s College London
    King’s College London)

  • Di Hu

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
    Imperial College London)

  • Joy N. Ismail

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at King’s College London
    King’s College London)

  • Brian M. Schilder

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
    Imperial College London)

  • Alexi Nott

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
    Imperial College London)

  • Nathan G. Skene

    (UK Dementia Research Institute at Imperial College London
    Imperial College London)

  • Sarah J. Marzi

    (Imperial College London
    UK Dementia Research Institute at King’s College London
    King’s College London)

Abstract

DNA-protein interactions have traditionally been profiled via chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq). Cleavage Under Targets & Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) is a rapidly expanding technique that enables the profiling of such interactions in situ at high sensitivity. However, thorough evaluation and benchmarking against established ChIP-seq datasets are lacking. Here, we comprehensively benchmarked CUT&Tag for H3K27ac and H3K27me3 against published ChIP-seq profiles from ENCODE in K562 cells. Combining multiple new and published CUT&Tag datasets, there was an average recall of 54% known ENCODE peaks for both histone modifications. We tested peak callers MACS2 and SEACR and identified optimal peak calling parameters. Overall, peaks identified by CUT&Tag represent the strongest ENCODE peaks and show the same functional and biological enrichments as ChIP-seq peaks identified by ENCODE. Our workflow systematically evaluates the merits of methodological adjustments, providing a benchmarking framework for the experimental design and analysis of CUT&Tag studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Leyla Abbasova & Paulina Urbanaviciute & Di Hu & Joy N. Ismail & Brian M. Schilder & Alexi Nott & Nathan G. Skene & Sarah J. Marzi, 2025. "CUT&Tag recovers up to half of ENCODE ChIP-seq histone acetylation peaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58137-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58137-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58137-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-58137-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58137-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.