IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-58043-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep reinforcement learning can promote sustainable human behaviour in a common-pool resource problem

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Koster

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Miruna Pîslar

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Andrea Tacchetti

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Jan Balaguer

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Leqi Liu

    (Google DeepMind
    Princeton University)

  • Romuald Elie

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Oliver P. Hauser

    (University of Exeter)

  • Karl Tuyls

    (Google DeepMind)

  • Matt Botvinick

    (Google DeepMind
    Yale University)

  • Christopher Summerfield

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

A canonical social dilemma arises when resources are allocated to people, who can either reciprocate with interest or keep the proceeds. The right resource allocation mechanisms can encourage levels of reciprocation that sustain the commons. Here, in an iterated multiplayer trust game, we use deep reinforcement learning (RL) to design a social planner that promotes sustainable contributions from human participants. We first trained neural networks to behave like human players, creating a stimulated economy that allows us to study the dynamics of receipt and reciprocation. We use RL to train a mechanism to maximise aggregate return to players. The RL mechanism discovers a redistributive policy that leads to a large but also more equal surplus. The mechanism outperforms baseline mechanisms by conditioning its generosity on available resources and temporarily sanctioning defectors. Examining the RL policy allows us to develop a similar but explainable mechanism that is more popular among players.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Koster & Miruna Pîslar & Andrea Tacchetti & Jan Balaguer & Leqi Liu & Romuald Elie & Oliver P. Hauser & Karl Tuyls & Matt Botvinick & Christopher Summerfield, 2025. "Deep reinforcement learning can promote sustainable human behaviour in a common-pool resource problem," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58043-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58043-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58043-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-58043-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-58043-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.