IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-57957-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes

Author

Listed:
  • Haitao Han

    (Fudan University)

  • Ziye Wang

    (Nankai University)

  • Shanfeng Zhu

    (Fudan University
    Ministry of Education
    Fudan University
    Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center)

Abstract

Metagenomic binning is a culture-free approach that facilitates the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes by grouping genomic fragments. However, there remains a lack of a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the performance of metagenomic binning tools across various combinations of data types and binning modes. In this study, we benchmark 13 metagenomic binning tools using short-read, long-read, and hybrid data under co-assembly, single-sample, and multi-sample binning, respectively. The benchmark results demonstrate that multi-sample binning exhibits optimal performance across short-read, long-read, and hybrid data. Moreover, multi-sample binning outperforms other binning modes in identifying potential antibiotic resistance gene hosts and near-complete strains containing potential biosynthetic gene clusters across diverse data types. This study also recommends three efficient binners across all data-binning combinations, as well as high-performance binners for each combination.

Suggested Citation

  • Haitao Han & Ziye Wang & Shanfeng Zhu, 2025. "Benchmarking metagenomic binning tools on real datasets across sequencing platforms and binning modes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57957-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57957-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57957-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-57957-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57957-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.