IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-57607-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets

Author

Listed:
  • Michael G. Windisch

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association
    Humboldt University of Berlin
    ETH Zurich)

  • Florian Humpenöder

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Leon Merfort

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Nico Bauer

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Gunnar Luderer

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association
    Technische Universität Berlin)

  • Jan Philipp Dietrich

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Jens Heinke

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Christoph Müller

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Gabriel Abrahao

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association)

  • Hermann Lotze-Campen

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association
    Humboldt University of Berlin)

  • Alexander Popp

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research - Member of the Leibniz Association
    Kassel Institute for Sustainability
    University of Kassel)

Abstract

Achieving the Paris Agreement’s CO2 emission reduction goals heavily relies on enhancing carbon storage and sequestration in forests globally. Yet, the increasing vulnerability of carbon stored in forests to both climate change and human intervention is often neglected in current mitigation strategies. Our study explores modelled interactions between key emission sectors, indicating that accelerated decarbonization could meet climate objectives despite forest carbon losses due to disturbances. However, delaying action on forest carbon loss by just five years consistently doubles the additional mitigation costs and efforts across key sectors, regardless of the assessed forest disturbance rates. Moreover, these myopic responses to forest carbon loss are as stringent, or even more demanding, than immediate responses to twice the forest disturbance rate. Our results underline the urgent need to monitor and safeguard forests for the economic feasibility of the Paris Agreement’s climate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael G. Windisch & Florian Humpenöder & Leon Merfort & Nico Bauer & Gunnar Luderer & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Jens Heinke & Christoph Müller & Gabriel Abrahao & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Alexander Popp, 2025. "Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57607-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57607-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57607-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.