IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-57179-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpreting mammalian synonymous site conservation in light of the unwanted transcript hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Christmas

    (Uppsala University
    Uppsala University)

  • Michael X. Dong

    (Uppsala University
    Uppsala University)

  • Jennifer R. S. Meadows

    (Uppsala University
    Uppsala University)

  • Sergey V. Kozyrev

    (Uppsala University
    Uppsala University)

  • Kerstin Lindblad-Toh

    (Uppsala University
    Uppsala University
    Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard)

Abstract

Mammalian genomes are biased towards GC bases at third codon positions, likely due to a GC-biased ancestral genome and the selectively neutral recombination-related process of GC-biased gene conversion. The unwanted transcript hypothesis posits that this high GC content at synonymous sites may be beneficial for protecting against spurious transcripts, particularly in species with low effective population sizes. Utilising a 240 placental mammal genome alignment and single-base resolution conservation scores, we interpret sequence conservation at mammalian four-fold degenerate sites in this context and find evidence in support of the unwanted transcript hypothesis, including a strong GC bias, high conservation at sites relating to exon splicing, less human genetic variation at conserved four-fold degenerate sites, and conservation of sites important for epigenetic regulation of developmental genes. Additionally, we show that high conservation of four-fold degenerate sites in essential developmental genes, including homeobox genes, likely relates to the low mutation rates experienced by these genes.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Christmas & Michael X. Dong & Jennifer R. S. Meadows & Sergey V. Kozyrev & Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, 2025. "Interpreting mammalian synonymous site conservation in light of the unwanted transcript hypothesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57179-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57179-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57179-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-57179-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-57179-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.