IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-56914-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Olaparib combined to metronomic cyclophosphamide and metformin in women with recurrent advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer: the ENDOLA phase I/II trial

Author

Listed:
  • Max Piffoux

    (France; GINECO)

  • Alexandra Leary

    (France; GINECO)

  • Philippe Follana

    (France; GINECO)

  • Cyril Abdeddaim

    (France; GINECO)

  • Florence Joly

    (France; GINECO)

  • Sylvie Bin

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Maxime Bonjour

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Anais Boulai

    (Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University)

  • Celine Callens

    (Institut Curie and Paris Sciences Lettres University)

  • Laurent Villeneuve

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Marine Alexandre

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Verane Schwiertz

    (Hospices Civils de Lyon)

  • Gilles Freyer

    (France; GINECO)

  • Manuel Rodrigues

    (Institut Curie
    France; GINECO)

  • Benoit You

    (France; GINECO)

Abstract

Endometrial cancers are characterized by frequent alterations in the PI3K-AKT-mTor, IGF1 and DNA repair signaling pathways. Concomitant inhibition of these pathways was warranted. ENDOLA phase I/II trial (NCT02755844) was designed to assess the safety/efficacy of the triplet combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib, metronomic cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily), and PI3K-AKT-mTor inhibitor metformin (1500 mg daily) in women with recurrent endometrial carcinomas. Olaparib dose-escalation (100-300 mg twice-a-day (bid)) was used to determine the recommended-phase II-trial-dose (RP2D, primary endpoint), followed by an expansion cohort to determine the non-progression rate at 10 weeks (NPR-10w, secondary endpoint). 31 patients were treated. Olaparib RP2D was defined as 300 mg bid. The tolerability was acceptable, and grade 3-4 adverse events (51% patients) were mainly hematological. The NPR-10w was 61.5%, and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.2 months. In a post-hoc analysis, when explored by molecular subtypes/alterations, longer PFS were observed in patients with tumors characterized by a non-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP, n = 4; mPFS, 9.1 months), and by both TP53 altered & high number of large genomic alterations (LGA ≥ 8)(n = 10, mPFS, 8.6 months)). The analyses about kinetics of circulating biomarkers and pharmacodynamic effects are not reported here. In total, the benefit/toxicity ratio of the all-oral olaparib/cyclophosphamide/metformin regimen was favorable in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent endometrial cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Piffoux & Alexandra Leary & Philippe Follana & Cyril Abdeddaim & Florence Joly & Sylvie Bin & Maxime Bonjour & Anais Boulai & Celine Callens & Laurent Villeneuve & Marine Alexandre & Verane Schwie, 2025. "Olaparib combined to metronomic cyclophosphamide and metformin in women with recurrent advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer: the ENDOLA phase I/II trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56914-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56914-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56914-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-56914-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ainhoa Madariaga & Swati Garg & Nairi Tchrakian & Neesha C. Dhani & Waldo Jimenez & Stephen Welch & Helen MacKay & Josee-Lyne Ethier & Lucy Gilbert & Xuan Li & Angela Rodriguez & Lucy Chan & Valerie B, 2023. "Clinical outcome and biomarker assessments of a multi-centre phase II trial assessing niraparib with or without dostarlimab in recurrent endometrial carcinoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56914-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.