IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-56817-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of reproductive systems on grapevine genome and breeding

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Xiao

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Yue Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Wenwen Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Xiaoya Shi

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    Northwest A&F University)

  • Siyang Huang

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Shuo Cao

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Qiming Long

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Xu Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Zhongjie Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    China Resources Research Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Xiaodong Xu

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Yanling Peng

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Pengfei Wang

    (Shandong Academy of Grape)

  • Zhonghao Jiang

    (Shenzhen University)

  • Summaira Riaz

    (San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Center, United States Department of Agriculture)

  • Andrew M. Walker

    (San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Center, United States Department of Agriculture)

  • Brandon S. Gaut

    (University of California)

  • Sanwen Huang

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences)

  • Yongfeng Zhou

    (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences)

Abstract

Diversified reproductive systems can be observed in the plant kingdom and applied in crop breeding; however, their impacts on crop genomic variation and breeding remain unclear. Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), a widely planted fruit tree, underwent a shift from dioecism to monoecism during domestication and involves crossing, self-pollination, and clonal propagation for its cultivation. In this study, we discover that the reproductive types, namely, crossing, selfing, and cloning, dramatically impact genomic landscapes and grapevine breeding based on comparative genomic and population genetics of wild grapevine and a complex pedigree of Pinot Noir. The impacts are widely divergent, which show interesting patterns of genomic purging and the Hill-Robertson interference. Selfing reduces genomic heterozygosity, while cloning increases it, resulting in a “double U-shaped” site frequency spectrum (SFS). Crossing and cloning conceal while selfing purges most deleterious and structural burdens. Moreover, the close leakage of large-effect deleterious and structural variations in repulsion phases maintains heterozygous genomic regions in 4.3% of the grapevine genome after successive selfing for nine generations. Our study provides new insights into the genetic basis of clonal propagation and genomic breeding of clonal crops by purging deleterious variants while integrating beneficial variants through various reproductive systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Xiao & Yue Wang & Wenwen Liu & Xiaoya Shi & Siyang Huang & Shuo Cao & Qiming Long & Xu Wang & Zhongjie Liu & Xiaodong Xu & Yanling Peng & Pengfei Wang & Zhonghao Jiang & Summaira Riaz & Andrew M. , 2025. "Impacts of reproductive systems on grapevine genome and breeding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56817-7
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56817-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56817-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-56817-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mélanie Massonnet & Noé Cochetel & Andrea Minio & Amanda M. Vondras & Jerry Lin & Aline Muyle & Jadran F. Garcia & Yongfeng Zhou & Massimo Delledonne & Summaira Riaz & Rosa Figueroa-Balderas & Brandon, 2020. "The genetic basis of sex determination in grapes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Maria Mercuri & Paola Torri & Assunta Florenzano & Eleonora Clò & Marta Mariotti Lippi & Elisabetta Sgarbi & Cristina Bignami, 2021. "Sharing the Agrarian Knowledge with Archaeology: First Evidence of the Dimorphism of Vitis Pollen from the Middle Bronze Age of N Italy (Terramara Santa Rosa di Poviglio)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Pat Iocco-Corena & Jamila Chaïb & Laurent Torregrosa & Don Mackenzie & Mark R. Thomas & Harley M. Smith, 2021. "VviPLATZ1 is a major factor that controls female flower morphology determination in grapevine," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Alessandro Vannozzi & Fabio Palumbo & Margherita Lucchin & Gianni Barcaccia, 2022. "Dioecy in Flowering Plants: From the First Observations of Prospero Alpini in the XVI Century to the Most Recent Advances in the Genomics Era," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56817-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.