IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-025-56762-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding

Author

Listed:
  • Ayberk Ozkirli

    (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL))

  • David Pascucci

    (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
    Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne
    The Sense Innovation and Research Center)

  • Michael H. Herzog

    (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL))

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayberk Ozkirli & David Pascucci & Michael H. Herzog, 2025. "Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56762-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56762-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56762-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-025-56762-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrien Doerig & Alban Bornet & Ruth Rosenholtz & Gregory Francis & Aaron M Clarke & Michael H Herzog, 2019. "Beyond Bouma's window: How to explain global aspects of crowding?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Guido Marco Cicchini & Giovanni D’Errico & David Charles Burr, 2022. "Crowding results from optimal integration of visual targets with contextual information," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guido Marco Cicchini & Giovanni D’Errico & David Charles Burr, 2025. "Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-5, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Marco Cicchini & Giovanni D’Errico & David Charles Burr, 2025. "Reply to: Failure to replicate a superiority effect in crowding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-5, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-56762-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.