IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-024-55200-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoadjuvant or concurrent atezolizumab with chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: a randomized phase I trial

Author

Listed:
  • Jyoti Mayadev

    (University of California San Diego)

  • Dmitriy Zamarin

    (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai)

  • Wei Deng

    (NRG Oncology Statistics & Data Center)

  • Heather A. Lankes

    (NRG OncologyOperations Center-Philadelphia East)

  • Giulio Pesci

    (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Hayeon Kim

    (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center)

  • Junzo P. Chino

    (Duke University)

  • Barbara Banbury

    (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp)

  • Ned Sherry

    (Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp)

  • Elad Sharon

    (Dana Faber Cancer Institute)

  • Sharad A. Ghamande

    (Augusta University Medical College of Georgia)

  • Catherine Ferguson

    (Augusta University Medical College of Georgia)

  • Loren Mell

    (University of California San Diego)

  • Laura Holman

    (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center)

  • Cara Mathews

    (Women & Infants Hospital)

  • David O’Malley

    (The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus)

  • Alexander Olawaiye

    (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)

  • Elizabeth Hopp

    (Medical College of Wisconsin)

  • Charles Leath

    (University of Alabama)

  • Larry Copeland

    (The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus)

  • Robert Mannel

    (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center)

  • Roisin O’Cearbhaill

    (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Carol Aghajanian

    (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)

  • Russell J. Schilder

    (Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel Medical College)

Abstract

Combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chemoradiation (CRT) is approved in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) but optimal sequencing of CRT and ICB is unknown. NRG-GY017 (NCT03738228) was a randomized phase I trial of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) neoadjuvant and concurrent with CRT (Arm A) vs. concurrent with CRT (Arm B) in patients with high-risk node-positive LACC. The primary endpoint was the fraction of expanded tumor-associated T-cell receptor (TCR) clones in blood at day 21 as a surrogate measure of anti-tumor immune response. Secondary objectives were safety and feasibility, 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and predictive value of PD-L1 expression. Forty patients were randomized, 36 received treatment, and 25 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. After cycle 1, there was peripheral expansion of higher proportion of tumor-associated TCR clones in Arm A than in Arm B (p = 0.0025) that remained higher at day 21, meeting the pre-specified endpoint on two-sample T-test (p = 0.052), but not on sensitivity analysis by Wilcoxon test (p = 0.13). At the median follow up of 25.8 months, 2-year DFS was 76% in Arm A and 56% in Arm B (p = 0.28). There were no new safety signals. In conclusion, neoadjuvant ICB prior to CRT was safe and was associated with immunologically and clinically favorable outcomes, warranting larger confirmatory studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyoti Mayadev & Dmitriy Zamarin & Wei Deng & Heather A. Lankes & Giulio Pesci & Hayeon Kim & Junzo P. Chino & Barbara Banbury & Ned Sherry & Elad Sharon & Sharad A. Ghamande & Catherine Ferguson & Lor, 2025. "Neoadjuvant or concurrent atezolizumab with chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: a randomized phase I trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55200-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55200-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-55200-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-55200-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55200-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.