IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-024-54716-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwik Gąsiorowski

    (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences)

  • Chew Chai

    (Stanford University)

  • Andrei Rozanski

    (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences)

  • Gargi Purandare

    (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences)

  • Fruzsina Ficze

    (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences)

  • Athanasia Mizi

    (University Medical Centre Göttingen)

  • Bo Wang

    (Stanford University)

  • Jochen C. Rink

    (Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences)

Abstract

The remarkable regenerative abilities of flatworms are closely linked to neoblasts – adult pluripotent stem cells that are the only division-competent cell type outside of the reproductive system. Although the presence of neoblast-like cells and whole-body regeneration in other animals has led to the idea that these features may represent the ancestral metazoan state, the evolutionary origin of both remains unclear. Here we show that the catenulid Stenostomum brevipharyngium, a member of the earliest-branching flatworm lineage, lacks conventional neoblasts despite being capable of whole-body regeneration and asexual reproduction. Using a combination of single-nuclei transcriptomics, in situ gene expression analysis, and functional experiments, we find that cell divisions are not restricted to a single cell type and are associated with multiple fully differentiated somatic tissues. Furthermore, the cohort of germline multipotency genes, which are considered canonical neoblast markers, are not expressed in dividing cells, but in the germline instead, and we experimentally show that they are neither necessary for proliferation nor regeneration. Overall, our results challenge the notion that canonical neoblasts are necessary for flatworm regeneration and open up the possibility that neoblast-like cells may have evolved convergently in different animals, independent of their regenerative capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwik Gąsiorowski & Chew Chai & Andrei Rozanski & Gargi Purandare & Fruzsina Ficze & Athanasia Mizi & Bo Wang & Jochen C. Rink, 2025. "Regeneration in the absence of canonical neoblasts in an early branching flatworm," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54716-x
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54716-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54716-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-54716-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54716-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.