IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-54460-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II DEEPER trial

Author

Listed:
  • Manabu Shiozawa

    (Kanagawa Cancer Center)

  • Yu Sunakawa

    (St. Marianna University School of Medicine)

  • Takanori Watanabe

    (Tokushima Municipal Hospital)

  • Hirofumi Ota

    (Ikeda City Hospital)

  • Hisateru Yasui

    (Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital)

  • Taichi Yabuno

    (Yokohama Municipal Citizen’s Hospital)

  • Mitsuyoshi Tei

    (Osaka Rosai Hospital)

  • Mitsugu Kochi

    (School of Medicine)

  • Dai Manaka

    (Kyoto Katsura Hospital)

  • Hisatsugu Ohori

    (Ishinomaki Red Cross Hospital)

  • Tatsuro Yamaguchi

    (Komagome Hospital)

  • Tamotsu Sagawa

    (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center)

  • Masahito Kotaka

    (Sano Hospital)

  • Yutaro Kubota

    (Showa University Hospital)

  • Takashi Sekikawa

    (Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital)

  • Masato Nakamura

    (Aizawa Hospital)

  • Masahiro Takeuchi

    (The University of Tokyo)

  • Wataru Ichikawa

    (Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital)

  • Masashi Fujii

    (Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization)

  • Akihito Tsuji

    (Kagawa University)

Abstract

The clinical significance of FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody using cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. We report results from a randomized phase 2 DEEPER trial (UMIN000018217, jRCTs061180022) to test the superiority of modified (m)-FOLFOXIRI plus weekly cetuximab over bevacizumab in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC. Primary endpoint was depth of response (DpR). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), early tumor shrinkage (ETS) at week 8, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to tumor growth (TTG), time to treatment failure (TTF), association between tumor shrinkage and prognosis, association between TTG and prognosis, R0 resection rate, and safety. In 359 enrolled patients with RAS wt mCRC, median DpR was significantly better in cetuximab (57.3% vs 46.0%, p = 0.0029); however, ORR, ETS, R0 resection rate, TTG, TTF, PFS and OS were similar between 2 treatments. There was a weak association between DpR and survival time in both treatments. The correlation between TTG and OS was slightly stronger in cetuximab. The post-hoc exploratory analysis showed that cetuximab produced greater PFS (15.3 vs 11.7 months; HR 0.68) and OS (53.6 vs 40.2 months; HR 0.54) in patients with left-sided and RAS/BRAF wt tumors. m-FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab has clinical benefit for tumor shrinkage in RAS wt mCRC. The survival benefit for RAS/BRAF wt and left-sided mCRC needs further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Manabu Shiozawa & Yu Sunakawa & Takanori Watanabe & Hirofumi Ota & Hisateru Yasui & Taichi Yabuno & Mitsuyoshi Tei & Mitsugu Kochi & Dai Manaka & Hisatsugu Ohori & Tatsuro Yamaguchi & Tamotsu Sagawa &, 2024. "Modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II DEEPER trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54460-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54460-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54460-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-54460-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54460-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.