IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-54419-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PET-CT outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of rosuvastatin as an adjunct to standard tuberculosis treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Gail B. Cross

    (Department of Medicine
    Infectious Disease Translational Research Programme
    University of New South Wales
    Burnet Institute)

  • Intan P. Sari

    (Department of Medicine)

  • Sarah M. Burkill

    (Singapore Clinical Research Institute)

  • Chee Woei Yap

    (Department of Diagnostic Imaging)

  • Han Nguyen

    (Respiratory Medicine
    Department of Medicine Solna)

  • Do Quyet

    (Respiratory Medicine)

  • Victoria B. Dalay

    (De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute)

  • Emmanuel Gutierrez

    (De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute)

  • Vincent M. Balanag

    (Lung Centre of the Philippines)

  • Randy J. Castillo

    (Lung Centre of the Philippines)

  • Christina C. Chang

    (Central Clinical School)

  • Anthony D. Kelleher

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Jim O’Doherty

    (Clinical Imaging Research Centre
    Siemens Medical Solutions)

  • Nicholas I. Paton

    (Department of Medicine
    Infectious Disease Translational Research Programme
    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

Abstract

Adjunctive rosuvastatin for rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis (rs-PTB) shows no effect on microbiological or radiological outcomes in a phase IIb randomised, controlled trial (NCT04504851). We explore the impact of adjunctive rosuvastatin on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging in a sub-study of 24 participants. Changes in standardised uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean), Total Metabolic Volume, (TMV), Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG), cavity diameter and volume, between week 0 and week 8 post-randomisation, are evaluated. Here we show no evidence of difference in the reduction in TLG [median 65.8% for the rosuvastatin group (Q1, Q3 38.6, 94.5) vs 64.3% for standard tuberculosis treatment group (Q1, Q3 −20.0, 81.7), P = 0.32], reduction in cavity volume on CT [median 3.2 cm3 (IQR 11.1, 0.5) for rosuvastatin, 2.2 cm3 (IQR 4.6, 0.7) for control (p = 0.72)], or any other PET-CT parameter measured. We show that the first 8-weeks of standard tuberculosis treatment results in a reduction in the volumetric indices (TLG and TMV), but had little change in SUVmax or SUVmean. Change in TLG and TMV holds promise as biomarkers of tuberculosis treatment response: future PET-CT studies should evaluate their role in predicting relapse-free cure, and the overall role of 18F-FDG-PET-CT as a tool for early-phase tuberculosis clinical trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Gail B. Cross & Intan P. Sari & Sarah M. Burkill & Chee Woei Yap & Han Nguyen & Do Quyet & Victoria B. Dalay & Emmanuel Gutierrez & Vincent M. Balanag & Randy J. Castillo & Christina C. Chang & Anthon, 2024. "PET-CT outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of rosuvastatin as an adjunct to standard tuberculosis treatment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54419-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54419-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54419-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-54419-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54419-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.