IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-50609-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toxic eburicol accumulation drives the antifungal activity of azoles against Aspergillus fumigatus

Author

Listed:
  • Hesham Elsaman

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

  • Evgeny Golubtsov

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

  • Sean Brazil

    (the University of Dublin)

  • Natanya Ng

    (the University of Dublin)

  • Isabel Klugherz

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
    Medical University of Graz)

  • Ronny Martin

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg)

  • Karl Dichtl

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
    Medical University of Graz)

  • Christoph Müller

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

  • Johannes Wagener

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
    the University of Dublin
    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)

Abstract

Azole antifungals inhibit the sterol C14-demethylase (CYP51/Erg11) of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway. Here we show that the azole-induced synthesis of fungicidal cell wall carbohydrate patches in the pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus strictly correlates with the accumulation of the CYP51 substrate eburicol. A lack of other essential ergosterol biosynthesis enzymes, such as sterol C24-methyltransferase (Erg6A), squalene synthase (Erg9) or squalene epoxidase (Erg1) does not trigger comparable cell wall alterations. Partial repression of Erg6A, which converts lanosterol into eburicol, increases azole resistance. The sterol C5-desaturase (ERG3)-dependent conversion of eburicol into 14-methylergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3β,6α-diol, the “toxic diol” responsible for the fungistatic activity against yeasts, is not required for the fungicidal effects in A. fumigatus. While ERG3-lacking yeasts are azole resistant, ERG3-lacking A. fumigatus becomes more susceptible. Mutants lacking mitochondrial complex III functionality, which are much less effectively killed, but strongly inhibited in growth by azoles, convert eburicol more efficiently into the supposedly “toxic diol”. We propose that the mode of action of azoles against A. fumigatus relies on accumulation of eburicol which exerts fungicidal effects by triggering cell wall carbohydrate patch formation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hesham Elsaman & Evgeny Golubtsov & Sean Brazil & Natanya Ng & Isabel Klugherz & Ronny Martin & Karl Dichtl & Christoph Müller & Johannes Wagener, 2024. "Toxic eburicol accumulation drives the antifungal activity of azoles against Aspergillus fumigatus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-50609-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50609-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50609-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-50609-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinhong Xie & Jeffrey M. Rybak & Adela Martin-Vicente & Xabier Guruceaga & Harrison I. Thorn & Ashley V. Nywening & Wenbo Ge & Josie E. Parker & Steven L. Kelly & P. David Rogers & Jarrod R. Fortwende, 2024. "The sterol C-24 methyltransferase encoding gene, erg6, is essential for viability of Aspergillus species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adela Martin-Vicente & Ana Camila Oliveira Souza & Xabier Guruceaga & Harrison I. Thorn & Jinhong Xie & Ashley V. Nywening & Wenbo Ge & Jarrod R. Fortwendel, 2024. "A conserved fungal morphogenetic kinase regulates pathogenic growth in response to carbon source diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-50609-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.