IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-50294-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents

Author

Listed:
  • M. Rudnev

    (University of Waterloo)

  • H. C. Barrett

    (UCLA)

  • W. Buckwalter

    (George Mason University)

  • E. Machery

    (University of Pittsburgh
    University of Johannesburg)

  • S. Stich

    (Rutgers University)

  • K. Barr

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • A. Bencherifa

    (University of Johannesburg
    Université Internationale de Rabat)

  • R. F. Clancy

    (Virginia Tech)

  • D. L. Crone

    (Northeastern University)

  • Y. Deguchi

    (Kyoto University)

  • E. Fabiano

    (University of Coimbra
    Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru)

  • A. D. Fodeman

    (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC))

  • B. Guennoun

    (Ibn Tofail University)

  • J. Halamová

    (Comenius University in Bratislava)

  • T. Hashimoto

    (Toyo University)

  • J. Homan

    (University of Kansas)

  • M. Kanovský

    (Comenius University in Bratislava)

  • K. Karasawa

    (The University of Tokyo)

  • H. Kim

    (Korea University)

  • J. Kiper

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham)

  • M. Lee

    (Seoul National University)

  • X. Liu

    (Wuhan University)

  • V. Mitova

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • R. B. Nair

    (University of Johannesburg
    Indian Institute of Technology)

  • L. Pantovic

    (University of Belgrade)

  • B. Porter

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • P. Quintanilla

    (University of Johannesburg
    Universidad San Francisco de Quito)

  • J. Reijer

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • P. P. Romero

    (Universidad San Francisco de Quito)

  • P. Singh

    (Indian Institute of Technology)

  • S. Tber

    (Université Internationale de Rabat)

  • D. A. Wilkenfeld

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • L. Yi

    (University of Pittsburgh)

  • I. Grossmann

    (University of Waterloo
    University of Johannesburg)

Abstract

Wisdom is the hallmark of social judgment, but how people across cultures recognize wisdom remains unclear—distinct philosophical traditions suggest different views of wisdom’s cardinal features. We explore perception of wise minds across 16 socio-economically and culturally diverse convenience samples from 12 countries. Participants assessed wisdom exemplars, non-exemplars, and themselves on 19 socio-cognitive characteristics, subsequently rating targets’ wisdom, knowledge, and understanding. Analyses reveal two positively related dimensions—Reflective Orientation and Socio-Emotional Awareness. These dimensions are consistent across the studied cultural regions and interact when informing wisdom ratings: wisest targets—as perceived by participants—score high on both dimensions, whereas the least wise are not reflective but moderately socio-emotional. Additionally, individuals view themselves as less reflective but more socio-emotionally aware than most wisdom exemplars. Our findings expand folk psychology and social judgment research beyond the Global North, showing how individuals perceive desirable cognitive and socio-emotional qualities, and contribute to an understanding of mind perception.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Rudnev & H. C. Barrett & W. Buckwalter & E. Machery & S. Stich & K. Barr & A. Bencherifa & R. F. Clancy & D. L. Crone & Y. Deguchi & E. Fabiano & A. D. Fodeman & B. Guennoun & J. Halamová & T. Hash, 2024. "Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-50294-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50294-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50294-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-50294-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-50294-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.