Author
Listed:
- Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard
(University Claude Bernard)
- Aude-Marie Savoye
(GINECO and Institut Jean Godinot)
- Camille Schiffler
(University Claude Bernard)
- Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
(Centre Jean Perrin)
- Olfa Derbel
(Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz)
- Elsa Kalbacher
(GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz)
- Marianne LeHeurteur
(Centre Henri-Becquerel)
- Alejandra Martinez
(Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT) Oncopole)
- Corina Cornila
(GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Régional d’Orléans)
- Mathilde Martinez
(GINECO and Clinique Pasteur)
- Leila Bengrine Lefevre
(GINECO and Centre Georges-François Leclerc)
- Frank Priou
(GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée)
- Nicolas Cloarec
(GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut d’Avignon)
- Laurence Venat
(GINECO and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren)
- Frédéric Selle
(GINECO and Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon)
- Dominique Berton
(Centre René Gauducheau)
- Olivier Collard
(GINECO and Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Hôpital Privé de la Loire)
- Elodie Coquan
(Centre François Baclesse, University Caen Normandie)
- Olivia Saux
(University Claude Bernard
Centre Léon Bérard)
- Isabelle Treilleux
(University Claude Bernard)
- Sophie Gouerant
(Centre Henri-Becquerel)
- Antoine Angelergues
(GINECO and Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon)
- Florence Joly
(Centre François Baclesse, University Caen Normandie)
- Olivier Tredan
(Centre Léon Bérard)
Abstract
This open-label, non-comparative, 2:1 randomized, phase II trial (NCT03275506) in women with stage IIIC/IV high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) for whom upfront complete resection was unachievable assessed whether adding pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to standard-of-care carboplatin plus paclitaxel yielded a complete resection rate (CRR) of at least 50%. Postoperatively patients continued assigned treatment for a maximum of 2 years. Postoperative bevacizumab was optional. The primary endpoint was independently assessed CRR at interval debulking surgery. Secondary endpoints were Completeness of Cytoreduction Index (CCI) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores, objective and best response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, postoperative morbidity, and pathological complete response. The CRR in 61 pembrolizumab-treated patients was 74% (one-sided 95% CI = 63%), exceeding the prespecified ≥50% threshold and meeting the primary objective. The CRR without pembrolizumab was 70% (one-sided 95% CI = 54%). In the remaining patients CCI scores were ≥3 in 27% of the standard-of-care group and 18% of the investigational group and CC1 in 3% of the investigational group. PCI score decreased by a mean of 9.6 in the standard-of-care group and 10.2 in the investigational group. Objective response rates were 60% and 72%, respectively, and best overall response rates were 83% and 90%, respectively. Progression-free survival was similar with the two regimens (median 20.8 versus 19.4 months in the standard-of-care versus investigational arms, respectively) but overall survival favored pembrolizumab-containing therapy (median 35.3 versus 49.8 months, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with pembrolizumab-containing therapy were anemia during neoadjuvant therapy and infection/fever postoperatively. Pembrolizumab was discontinued prematurely because of adverse events in 23% of pembrolizumab-treated patients. Combining pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for HGSC considered not completely resectable; observed activity in some subgroups justifies further evaluation to improve understanding of the role of immunotherapy in HGSC.
Suggested Citation
Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard & Aude-Marie Savoye & Camille Schiffler & Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier & Olfa Derbel & Elsa Kalbacher & Marianne LeHeurteur & Alejandra Martinez & Corina Cornila & Mathilde Martin, 2024.
"Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-46999-x
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46999-x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-46999-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.